News Flash 609: Weekly Snapshot of Public Health Challenges

News Flash Links, as part of the research project PEAH (Policies for Equitable Access to Health), aim to focus on the latest challenges by trade and governments rules to equitable access to health in resource-limited settings

Dorid nudibranch (Felimare picta)

News Flash 609

Weekly Snapshot of Public Health Challenges

 

Health system responses to population declines: call for papers

Call for papers (CFP) for APCRI (Association for Prevention and Control of Rabies in India) Journal: deadline April 15, 2025. Submit at https://medical.advancedresearchpublications.com/index.php/APCRIJ/login  or email to profcmrgkmc24@gmail.com

Is tax alone enough to pay for NHI? We do the sums

US aid cuts will make world ‘less healthy, less safe and less prosperous’: Guterres

Humanitarian aid’s extreme donor dependency problem in five charts

Recent Events Have Made Primary Care More Fragile—Further Challenges Lie Ahead

Order out of Chaos

Examining the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Using a One Health Approach: Profiling Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, and Viet Nam  by Laura H. Kahn

INTERVIEW: Sebastian Kevany  by Daniele Dionisio

Tackling the growing burden of nitrous oxide-induced public health harms

Triage systems in low-resource emergency care settings

In significant move, Thailand rejects patent on vital Hepatitis C drug

Uganda reports second Ebola death, a 4-year-old, WHO says

Uganda contains Ebola, but warns it’s not over yet

Yes! We Can End TB: Commit, Invest, Deliver: World TB Day 2025 Toolkit launch

Some Intellectual Property Claims Related to Pathogens That Can Cause Public Health Emergencies

The Global Fund will roll out the twice-yearly anti-HIV jab — with or without Pepfar

Enhancing Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation for Hospitalized and Recently Discharged People Living With HIV in Johannesburg, South Africa

DNDi 2024 R&D Programmes in Review

Salim and Quarraisha Abdool Karim: protecting young women, ending HIV

International Women’s Day, 2025 New Report Finds Sexist Laws Persist Worldwide

Our Silence on Female Genital Mutilation in Sierra Leone Will Not Protect Us

Groundbreaking Intervention in Tanzania Cuts Maternal Deaths

HRR760. TOO MANY DECADES HAVE BEEN LOST TO THE MYTH THAT LIBERAL DEMOCRACIES WILL DELIVER DEMOCRACY

Profit Motive: A Vicious Determinant Of Health

Obesity is on the rise in Africa. Here’s what UNICEF is doing about it

Seed Vault Receives Key African Deposits for Food Security

Rethinking Nutrition Financing for Greater Impact and Sustainability

Hand pollination helps cocoa farmers offset climate harm

COP16 Deal Commits Nations to Raise $200 Billion Annually for Biodiversity; But Funding A Big Lift

 

 

 

 

 

Examining the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Using a One Health Approach: Profiling Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, and Viet Nam

IN A NUTSHELL
Author's note
…My One Health analysis on Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, and Viet Nam has shown that there are gaps in the SDGs, primarily in the domesticated animal and crop realm that impact human health and well-being. Antimicrobial resistance, zoonotic diseases, food safety, food security (from the production standpoint), soil health, pesticide use, and animal waste management are important areas that are being overlooked. Livestock and their wastes produce methane and nitrous oxide, potent greenhouse gasses. Unexploded ordnances contaminating environments and killing innocent people are also not tracked. SDGs that specifically follow these areas would provide important information to improve global health, well-being, and sustainability…

By Laura H. Kahn, MD, MPH, MPP

Co-Founder, One Health Initiative

Examining the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Using a One Health Approach: Profiling Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, and Viet Nam

 

In 2024, I compared the Ecuadorian Amazon Rainforest to the Galapagos Islands using a One Health approach. One Health is the concept that human, animal, plant, environmental and ecosystem health are linked. This concept can be visualized as a multi-dimensional matrix, assisting health professionals, researchers, and policy makers to analyze and address complex health challenges in a concise, systematic, and comprehensive way.

One Health Multi-dimensional Matrix:

In this paper, I will use the One Health matrix as a lens to evaluate five of the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as they pertain to four Southeast Asian countries: Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam. The five SDGs are: 2. Zero Hunger, 3. Good Health and Well Being, 6. Clean Water and Sanitation, 15. Life on Land, and 16. Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions. Each of these SDGs has targets and indicators. An example of a target is SDG 6.1: By 2030, achieve universal and equitable access to safe and affordable drinking water for all. The indicator for this target is: Proportion of population using safely managed drinking water services. Targets typically have two or more indicators which are tracked over time. The trends are either positive, negative, or neutral.

United Nations Sustainable Development Goals:

The SDGs were developed in 2012, at a United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The delegates created seventeen SDGs to reduce hunger, disease, deforestation, biodiversity loss, and other global issues by 2030. Since 2016, the UN’s Department of Economic and Social Affairs has issued annual SDG Reports, which evaluate progress towards the goals using indicator trends. For example, Goal 2: Zero Hunger has targets for success including ending malnutrition, stunting, and wasting in children under age 5. Goal 3. Good Health and Well-Being has targets that seek to reduce rates of mortality in infants, new mothers, children, and other groups as well as reducing rates of infectious and chronic diseases. For Goal 15. Life on Land, the targets range from halting deforestation to ending poaching and trafficking of endangered species. Other SDGs also involve One Health elements (i.e., SDGs 11, 12, 13, and 14), but for the sake of time, will not be included in this analysis.

The 2024 report, released on June 28th, found that while some of the SDGs have made progress, such as preventing HIV infections and improving education access for girls, others have fallen short or have regressed, particularly in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic. Problematic areas include worsening food insecurities, diminishing vaccine delivery to children, worsening access to clean water and sanitation, escalating geopolitical conflicts, and increasing species extinction risks. Country Profiles of the 17 SDGs targets and indicators for the 193 UN Member States highlight the trends.

Since I recently visited the Southeast Asian countries of Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, and Vietnam, I will examine them at the population level using the One Health matrix and compare the findings with the SDGs.

To understand the political, social, and economic factors of Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, and Vietnam, we must first briefly review the history of the region. 

Brief Historical Background

The ancient Khmer empire (802 CE to 1431 CE) of Cambodia encompassed much of the region that would subsequently become Thailand and Laos, influencing their languages, cultures, and traditions. In the mid-14th century, a Tai army attacked the Khmer empire’s capital at Angkor, contributing to its decline, and eventually becoming a Tai vassal state. The Khmer empire was succeeded by the Ayutthaya Kingdom (1351 to 1767) which became the precursor of modern Thailand.

Of the four countries, only Thailand avoided being colonized by European powers. Britain and France decided that Thailand would provide a useful buffer zone between the British colony of Burma and the French colony of Indochina. During World War 2, Thailand was under the rule of a military dictator named Phibunsongkhram, aka Phibun, who allowed Imperial Japan to build its infamous Thailand-Burma Railway, nicknamed the “death” railway within its borders. After the war, resistance groups forced Phibun to resign. Thailand subsequently became a pro-Western country, allying with the U.S. during the Cold War, and benefitting financially from U.S. economic and military aid during the Vietnam War.

In contrast to Thailand, Vietnam had been colonized by a succession of Chinese dynasties for 1000 years, from 111 BC to 939 AD, enduring a long history of warfare.  From the 11th to 18th centuries, Vietnam conquered parts of the Khmer empire and spread southward, but outbreaks of fighting between different war lords developed. France established a colony in Vietnam after assisting one of the war lords, and by the late 19th century, it had gained control of Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos, calling the region French Indochina. France used the colonies for their natural resources.

Resistance movements began soon after the French takeover.

Ho Chi Minh (1890-1969) was the leader of a major Vietnamese resistance movement, advocating for the independence of Indochina, and became a founding member of the Vietnamese Communist Party. He sought assistance from delegates at the Versailles peace conference at the end of World War I but was rebuffed.

At the end of World War II, he sought help from President Harry S. Truman for independence from French rule. Truman sided with the French. With Chinese assistance, Vietnamese Communist troops, called the Viet Minh, defeated the French at the Battle of Dien Bien Phu in 1954. Indochina was divided into communist North Vietnam, non-communist South Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos. One year later, Ho Chi Minh visited Moscow and secured economic and military aid from Leonid Brezhnev. This sequence of events led to war in Southeast Asia (1961-1973) as the U.S. sought to contain the spread of communism. The North Vietnamese and their allies defeated the U.S. which was forced to withdraw.

The U.S. heavily bombed Cambodia and Laos during the war in Vietnam. Civil war broke out in Cambodia, and in 1975, Pol Pot, the Communist leader of the Khmer Rouge seized control and began persecuting those whom the communists considered tainted by capitalism. Over the next four years, the Khmer Rouge committed genocide, killing over 1.7 million people. The Vietnamese invaded in 1979 and removed the Khmer Rouge from power. The horrors of the Khmer Rouge regime have inflicted long lasting traumas on the Cambodian people. Laos endured a secret war lasting from 1964 to 1973 during which time the U.S. bombed large areas of the country. The unexploded ordnances (UXO) contaminate the land and continue to kill innocent people.

Political, Social, and Economic Factors and SDG 16. 

Of the four countries, only Thailand escaped war with the U.S. and its bombing campaigns. Both Vietnam and Cambodia experienced civil war, but Cambodia alone endured the 5-year genocide involving 47% of its people. The survivors and their descendants continue to bear the scars of the atrocities. Cambodia has the lowest Human Development Index score even though Laos has the lowest GDP per capita. The Human Development Index is a composite score for life expectancy, education level attainment for adults aged 25 years, and gross national income per capita. None of the SDGs use the HDI as an indicator. 

Vietnam, a communist country, has the highest Happiness Index score. Their social cohesion appears high. The Happiness Index is based on a survey of subjective well-being by the Gallup World Poll. None of the SDGs use the Happiness Index as an indicator.

Transparency International is a nongovernmental organization with the mission to stop corruption and promote transparent and responsible government.  Of the four countries, the Vietnamese consider their country the least corrupt, with a Corruption Perception Index (CPI) score of 41/100, compared to the other three countries which have lower scores. Cambodians ranked their country as the most corrupt (CPI score 22). Thailand is the wealthiest of the four countries economically. It is considered moderately corrupt with a CPI score of 35/100 but ranked moderately happy. SDG 16. Peace and Justice targets 16.5 – 16.8 track corruption using the CPI.

(In comparison, Denmark and Finland are the least corrupt countries in the world, scoring 90 and 87, respectively, and they are the world’s happiest countries.)

The One Health matrix’s third dimension of political, social, and economic factors overlaps with SDG 16 which has targets such as: reducing rates of corruption, improving transparent government, and enforcing laws and policies for sustainable development.

Please see Table 1 below

One Health Factors and SDGs 2, 3, 6, 15 

Vietnam has the largest population and highest population density in the Greater Mekong Delta region. (Note: The region is named after the Mekong River which flows through all four countries as well as China, and Myanmar.)

SDG 2. Zero Hunger targets include prevalence rates of undernourishment or food insecurity, volume of food production, and agriculture orientation index of government expenditures, and agricultural export subsidies, among others. It does not include UN Food and Agriculture Organization data such as crop yields or national livestock inventories. The focus is on food consumption but not on food production.

Thailand has the most land surface area followed by Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia. It also has the most arable land for agriculture. Vietnam has less than half the arable land area as Thailand, but it is an agricultural powerhouse, being one of the largest producers of rice and coffee in the world.

Although food safety is briefly mentioned in Target 2.1, none of the indicators specifically track foodborne illness rates.

Food waste is tracked in SDG 12 by a food loss index and the food waste index.

SDG 3. Good Health and Well-Being. Thailand and Vietnam have comparable life expectancies although Thailand spends over two times more on healthcare per capita than Vietnam. Both countries have lower crude death rates, infant mortality rates, and fertility rates than Cambodia and Laos. Laos has the highest infant mortality rate and lowest life expectancy of the four countries. It spends five times less on healthcare per capita than Thailand. SDG 3. follows these metrics, but its targets do not include One Health issues such as reducing antimicrobial resistance or zoonotic diseases such as rabies, particularly in dogs, which is a major problem in the region.

In 2023, the WHO listed antimicrobial resistance as one of the top global public health and development threats in the world, directly responsible for an estimated 1.27 million deaths and indirectly responsible for almost 5 million deaths in 2019. Misuse and overuse of antimicrobials occur in human, animal, and plant health. It is a major One Health issue that includes environmental and ecosystem health. In 2015, WHO launched the Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) to track global antimicrobial consumption using a One Health surveillance model. As of 2022, WHO provides profiles of the member countries.

Dengue is a deadly mosquito-borne disease. Over 7.6 million cases were reported to WHO in 2024. Rates have been increasing, and with climate change, are likely to get worse. WHO began a global surveillance database for dengue.

The SDGs track malaria, tuberculosis, HIV, and neglected nontropical diseases, but they do not track rabies, a deadly zoonotic disease that causes almost 60,000 deaths in over 150 countries, particularly in Africa and Asia.  Rabies is a major problem in Southeast Asia. The virus is usually spread by dog bites.

SDG 6. Clean Water and Sanitation. The targets include the proportion of a population that has access to safe drinking water and sanitation facilities that dispose of human waste. Sanitation systems are designed to process human waste, not animal waste. Animal waste, particularly domestic animal waste, is typically not processed even though most fecal waste produced is from animals. Animal waste contaminates waterways and crops and contributes to water and foodborne illnesses. It might also be a source of antimicrobial resistant pathogens, particularly in Southeast Asia.

SDG 15. Life on Land. Laos is the only country that is landlocked, but it has the highest percentage of forested land. Cambodia has the highest deforestation rate followed by Vietnam, Laos, and Thailand.

All four countries have moderately poor air quality, but Thailand and Vietnam have the best water quality. Measurements of soil quality have yet to be published.

Endangered species are listed by taxonomic groups in the “Red List Index.” These groups include amphibians, mammals, cycads, and warm-water reef-forming corals. Endangered sentinel species are not profiled. The World Wildlife Fund considers elephants and tigers to be endangered sentinel species in the Greater Mekong region. Laos was once known as the “Land of a Million Elephants” because historically it had the most wild elephants. In the latest count, the country had approximately 400 wild elephants left. Vietnam had less than 200 while Thailand had over 3,000. Wild tigers are extinct in Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam. Less than 250 tigers exist in Thailand. People care about specific charismatic animals, such as elephants and large cats. Tracking an endangered species index is vitally important, but profiling specific endangered animals that people feel passionate about might be equally important.

Please see Table 2 below

 One Health Matrix Identified SDG Gaps 

No Human Development Index (HDI) -life expectancy, income, education.

No Happiness Index—a measure of social well-being.

Food Security is tracked by consumption and less so on production.

No Food Safety or Foodborne Illness rates are tracked. (SDG 12 includes Food Loss and Food Waste)

Specific Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) rates in humans or animals are not tracked.

Zoonotic diseases such as rabies death rates are not tracked.

Vaccination Rates in animals, such as canine vaccination rates against rabies, are not tracked.

Domestic Animal Health (e.g., cats, dogs, or livestock) is not represented in SDGs.

Soil health is not tracked.

Crop production and yields are not tracked.

Livestock production and yields are not tracked.

Pesticide use in crops is not tracked.

There is no Domestic Animal Waste Production Index

There is no Domestic Animal Waste Management Index.

Specific Endangered Sentinel Wildlife are not tracked.

Unexploded ordnances not tracked in war-torn nations. 

Conclusions 

Colonization and war have severe consequences for a nation’s health, wealth, and well-being. The history of the four Southeast Asian countries profiled in this paper illustrates this point. Thailand was never colonized and avoided war. From a One Health perspective, its people, animals, and environments are faring the best, although Vietnam, despite its war-torn history, is a close second. The fact that Vietnam defeated the United States during the 20th century war is a likely explanation for the optimism, social cohesion, and dynamism of its people. Comparing the Corruption Perceptions Index and Happiness Index of the four countries finds that Vietnam ranks the highest of these two measures even though Thailand is technically the wealthiest of the four based on its GDP and Health Expenditures. 

My One Health analysis has shown that there are gaps in the SDGs, primarily in the domesticated animal and crop realm that impact human health and well-being. Antimicrobial resistance, zoonotic diseases, food safety, food security (from the production standpoint), soil health, pesticide use, and animal waste management are important areas that are being overlooked. Livestock and their wastes produce methane and nitrous oxide, potent greenhouse gasses. Unexploded ordnances contaminating environments and killing innocent people are also not tracked. SDGs that specifically follow these areas would provide important information to improve global health, well-being, and sustainability.

The 17 UN SDGs represent a global vision to improve life on Earth for all countries and for all peoples. Tracking the many targets and indicators over the years has been a monumental effort and a testament to the commitment by the international community to achieve these goals. The challenges of the 21st century will make these efforts increasingly important. A One Health approach should be included to ensure healthy animals, plants, environments, and ecosystems. 

 

Table 1. Political, Social, Economic Factors

Country Cambodia Laos Thailand Vietnam
Political Factors        
U.S.-Southeast Asia

War/Bombing Campaigns

Yes Yes No Yes
Civil War Yes (with genocide) No No Yes
Current Political System Constitutional Monarchy Communist Parliamentary democracy with a Constitutional Monarchy Communist
Social Factors
Corruption Perceptions Index Score 2023 22 28 35 41
Happiness Index

2021-2023

4.34 5.14 5.98 6.04
Economic Factors
GDP Per Capita (Current US$) (2023) 2429.7 2066.9 7182.0 4282.1
Human Development Index (2022) 0.600 0.620 0.803 0.726
Health Expenditure Per Capita (Current US$) (2021) 122.42 68.88 364.37 172.55

 

 Table 2. One Health Factors at Population Levels

Country Cambodia Laos Thailand Vietnam
Humans
Population 17.6 million 7.8 million 71.7 million 100.9 million
Population Density (people per km2) 100 34 140.1 328
Estimate of total human fecal production (kg/yr) 1.9 X 109 8.5 X 108 7.8 X 109 8.9 X 109
Life Expectancy for Both Sexes in Years (2024) 70.82 69.23 76.56 74.74
Total Fertility Rate (Live Births per Woman) (2024) 2.5 2.4 1.2 1.9
Infant Mortality Rate, Both Sexes, Probability of Dying Between Birth and Age 1 per 1000 Live Births (2022) 20.3

 

32.7

 

7.0 16.2
Crude Death Rate per 1,000 population 6.78 6.05 5.05 5.5
Dengue (total reported cases, 2024) 18,983 19,486 104,681 103,078
Rabies, reported human deaths 2022 No data, but  reportedly has one of the highest death rates in the world from rabid dog bites. 20 3 70
Animals (Domestic Livestock and Sentinel Wildlife Species)
Dogs (2021/2023) 5 million Est. 5 million 12.8 million 5.5 million
Chickens (per 1000 animals) (2023) 12,817 52,235 288,758 457,221
Ducks (per 1000 animals) (2023) 8,878 3,693 15,504 87,645
Buffalo (2023) 665,269 1,211,949 889,775 2,136,009
Cattle (2023) 2,611,835 2,542,707 4,630,798 6,331,895
Goats (2023) Est.400,000 786,965 483,417 3,088,328
Horses (2023) 31,585 32,000 7,230 48,821
Pigs/Swine (2023) 2,036,958 4,525,574 7,721,375 25,546,030
Estimated Total Domestic Animal Fecal Waste (kg/year) 2.6X109 3.7X109 7.0X109 13.6X109
Wild Elephant Population 400 to 600 400 3,084-3,500 <200
Wild Tiger Population Extinct Extinct 179-223 Extinct
Plants (Domestic)
Arable Land for Agriculture

(hectares) 2022

4,120 1,224 17,150 6,754
Coffee, green (2023) 365 tons 177,662 tons 16,575 tons 1,956,782 tons
Rice (2023) 12,900,000 tons 3,835,000 tons 33,070,957 tons 43,497,625 tons
Environments and Ecosystems
Air Quality.

Average Particulate Matter 2.5 microns (PM2.5),

2023

73 ug/m3 (Moderate)

 

88 ug/m3 (Moderate)

 

74 ug/m3

(Moderate)

 

88 ug/m3 (Moderate)

 

Water Quality. Environmental Performance Index (EPI) 2023 40.0 32.2 51.3 54.3
Soil Quality Asian Soil Laboratory Network (SEALNET), established in 2017, has not yet issued a report.
Percent Land Contamination with unexploded ordnance (UXO) >20% >20% Along Thai-Cambodian border >20%

 

Methodology used to calculate human and animal fecal waste production based on 2018 Nature Sustainability paper by Berendes, et al. ChatGPT used to estimate adult human and animal body weights and to calculate fecal production per human and animal populations.

 

__

By the same Author on PEAH

Lessons From Ecuador: A One Health Perspective

 

 

News Flash 608: Weekly Snapshot of Public Health Challenges

News Flash Links, as part of the research project PEAH (Policies for Equitable Access to Health), aim to focus on the latest challenges by trade and governments rules to equitable access to health in resource-limited settings

Red lance-urchin (Stylocidaris affinis)

News Flash 608

Weekly Snapshot of Public Health Challenges

 

America First Deepens World Stagnation

‘Playing With Fire’: DRC Could Become Disease Transmission Hotspot Following US Aid Freeze and Conflict

Tuberculosis Doesn’t Respect Borders—US Aid Cuts Could Fuel a Global Health Crisis

New round of polio vaccinations begins in Gaza

Roll out and prospects of the malaria vaccine R21/Matrix-M

Building Local Vaccine Manufacturing in the African Union: Key messages and reflections from a recent meeting in Addis

Over 800 people hospitalised and dozens are dead from waterborne infection in Sudan’s White Nile state

Court extends order lifting Trump administration’s foreign aid freeze

Nepal says seven more U.S.-funded projects paused after Trump order

26 Countries Are Most Vulnerable to US Global Health Aid Cuts. Can Other Funders Bridge the Gap?

Why the crisis in global aid is bigger than Trump

PEPFAR Reauthorization: Side-by-Side of Legislation Over Time

“This week, the medicines were not there”: What is at stake in the pandemic agreement

WHO strengthens support for grassroots crowdsourcing campaign: a global movement of unity and solidarity

People’s Health Dispatch Bulletin #95: A comeback for people-centered health models?

The Coventry experiment: why were Indian women in Britain given radioactive food without their consent?

HRR759. HISTORY IS A DISCIPLINE THAT MUST ULTIMATELY UNCOVER THE TRUTH AND COMPLETE (AND, IF NECESSARY, CHANGE) THE HISTORICAL NARRATIVE

Webinar registration: Securing and Sustaining Innovation in Integrated Care Mar 6, 2025

Healthy Longevity for All: Don’t leave aging people in LMICs behind

Confronting the growing epidemic of silicosis and tuberculosis among small-scale miners

DR Congo violence has pushed 35,000 to Burundi, says UN refugee agency

UNPO Supports the Ogoni People in High Court Case Against Shell for Oil Pollution

Meta’s new content policies risk fueling more mass violence and genocide

10 years of Women in Global Health

Global trends in maternal care call for a decolonization approach

Preventing HIV in women in Africa

Health: In major win, a key HIV drug arrives in Colombia under a CL

In Defense of Public Pharma at the University Medical Center Groningen: A Statement of Solidarity

How AI Could Reshape Health Care—Rise in Direct-to-Consumer Models

CARICOM Leaders Take Steps to Tackle Crime, Climate, Trade and Food Crises

 

 

 

News Flash 607: Weekly Snapshot of Public Health Challenges

News Flash Links, as part of the research project PEAH (Policies for Equitable Access to Health), aim to focus on the latest challenges by trade and governments rules to equitable access to health in resource-limited settings

Smooth tubeworm (Protula tubularia)

News Flash 607

Weekly Snapshot of Public Health Challenges

 

Ferri per curare: Dall’antichità alla robotica -Seeds of Florence

Navigating a New Era: Africa’s Health Systems after USAID Funding and the Road Ahead  by Kirubel Workiye Gebretsadik 

How USAID’s dismantling could impact noncommunicable diseases

Which Agreements Are Being Terminated by USAID?

Uncertainty around PEPFAR program puts millions of people at risk

How the health department will deal with Pepfar’s near collapse

Reaffirming the JAMA Network Commitment to the Health of Patients and the Public

Impact of Funding Freeze on TB Response in High TB Burden Countries

Framing Health and Well-Being: a Positive Confrontation Between Life and Social Sciences as a Trigger/Engine for Public Health Challenges  by Tomas Mainil 

INTERVIEW: Sebastian Kevany  by Daniele Dionisio 

With 10 Days of Talks Left, It’s ‘Now or Never’ for Pandemic Agreement

Why Latin America Needs Its Own CDC—Now More Than Ever

Public Pharma: still a missing debate in mainstream academia

A better way to solve a crisis: A new mechanism for incentivising R&D on new antimicrobials

Africa’s cholera resurgence exposes funding failures

Mass polio vaccination campaign to continue in the Gaza Strip

A Historic Leap for Women’s Rights: The AU Adopts the Convention to End Violence Against Women and Girls

Closing the women’s health gap: a call for more representation in innovation

Join the Meeting: IASC Briefing on the Pushback on Women’s Rights in Humanitarian Settings, Thursday, 6 March 2025

The ‘ethical recruitment’ of international nurses: Germany’s liberal health worker extractivism

HRR758. CAPITALISM HAS THE CAPACITY OF BUILDING AND DESTROYING IN A BIG SCALE

Prevalence of severe mental illness among people in prison across 43 countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

5 takeaways in the EU’s big agriculture (and food) vision

Only politics can end world hunger

Food, Water, Crime, Climate Change: CARICOM Leaders Begin 48th Conference with Commitment to Joint Action on Critical, Common Concerns

Protecting Peatlands a Win-Win Solution, If We Act Now

Asia-Pacific falling behind on sustainable development and climate targets

USAID environmental funding worth $70 mln frozen in Colombia, minister says

 

 

 

 

INTERVIEW: Sebastian Kevany

IN A NUTSHELL
Editor's note



An accomplished professional with years of experience across global health, diplomacy, international relations, development, and humanitarian assistance, Dr Sebastian Kevany has conducted over 100 field missions to Africa, the Middle East, the South Pacific, Eastern Europe, and Asia with a focus on monitoring and evaluation, health security, human rights, biosecurity, health sector governance, research, and operational site visits.

Dr Kevany holds BA and MA degrees from Trinity College Dublin, an MPH degree from the University of Cape Town, is an adjunct assistant professor at Trinity College Dublin, an academic affiliate of the Center for AIDS Prevention Studies at the University of California, San Francisco, and specializes in short term international technical assistance.

Currently, He is publishing his third public health book, this time on the relationship between climate change and public health.

In this connection, PEAH had the pleasure to arrange an interview relevant to the thematic issues of his upcoming book filtered through his experience and critical lens

By Daniele Dionisio

PEAH – Policies for Equitable Access to Health

 INTERVIEW

Sebastian Kevany

Global Health Security and Diplomacy

United Nations University

 

PEAHDr Kevany, can you detail about the main themes of your near to be finalized book tentatively entitled CLIMATE CHANGE, PUBLIC HEALTH, AND REGIONAL SECURITY IN THE INDOPACIFIC: FROM MITIGATION TO ADAPTATION?

Kevany: Daniele, thank you. So your first question, detail about the main themes of the book.

You know, it’s unquestionably, these days, a controversial subject. So I try to stay away from the controversial side, Daniele, and, think about specifically the links between the environment, as in climate, weather events, natural disasters, whatever you wanna call it, even political, environment, economic, but mainly environmental in terms of the natural environment, and its connection with human health, not just public health, but day to day individual level human health. It could be obesity. It could be mental health. Could be infectious disease, any of the above.

And, the Indo Pacific region is, of course, where all the action is, I guess you could say, in this regard.

PEAHThe book results from a number of chapters and a group of contributors. What as regards its scope and aims?

Kevany: As regards the scope and aims of the book, it is intended to generate inputs from not necessarily experts, but day to day, normal people living in the region, Hawaii, Philippines, even as far away as Pakistan, India, and to try and get an understanding for their experiences personally and professionally. Many of these people will have come from environmental or public health backgrounds. So just sharing their stories. Could be a nurse from The Philippines or a military officer from Sri Lanka. What is this connection that they have experienced, and what do they look, what do they expect to see in the future regarding the connection between climate change, public health, and, regional security.

PEAHIs there still room to include in the book additional contributions, either personal or professional, while enhancing its impact through as many views and experiences as possible?

Kevany: Regarding additional contributions, absolutely. There is room to include, at this stage, both personal and professional reflections, essays, or other inputs, and as you rightly say, enhancing its impact to as many views and experiences as possible.

PEAH: Let us know, please, about your global health and humanitarian background as part of your engagement with international agencies and organizations.

Kevany: My background, Daniele, yes, I guess it’s been a very engaging, adventurous, just amazing journey for me regarding efforts in global health, public health, I guess you could say humanitarian development.

And it’s involved WHO-World Health Organization, various United Nations organizations, the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB, Malaria, bilateral initiatives and NGOs, of course.

So it’s been, I’ve been so lucky, you know, to have done that work at a stage in history when it was a very dynamic field.

And I got to see a lot of the world, I feel that the efforts made an impact, not just a charitable impact, but in terms of international relations and international security as well.

PEAHDr Kevany, what’s your position as regards sentences below by All Life Institute (as “a global think tank uniquely dedicated to protecting and enhancing all life on this planet including humans, nonhumans and the Earth.”)?

  • “All that we do depends upon abundant plant and animal life as well as clean air and water.”
  • “Our collective future depends upon the decisions that we are making now.”

Kevany: In regards to the statements by the All Life Institute, you know, and thank you for the description of the Institute. It reminds me of the One Health approach, of course, when you quote  ‘’All that we do depends upon abundant plant and animal life, as well as clean air and water’’. For me personally, and based on my professional experience, it’s true.

It is a true statement. Without clean air, without clean water, the effects on human health are just one part of the consequences, because you have to deal as well with effects on the environment, all of these, I guess, indirect effects on human health. You know, not just the natural environment and the health and aesthetics of that realm, but also in terms of agriculture, in terms of social functioning, in terms of economics, which then leads into politics and national stability.

And in the same way, yeah, of course, our collective future does depend on the decisions that we are making now. But for both quotes, what I would suggest is this is not obvious and it’s hard to prove. And in theory, it is logical.

But we’re just getting into a stage, I think, when we’re becoming more aware of the finite nature of the Earth’s resources in the context of human population. It’s not something that was very much in our consciousness a generation ago. It wasn’t part of economic theory, which promoted growth and gross domestic product and those kind of indicators as the number one measures of success, I guess you could say, personally or nationally.

And it was before the themes of resilience started to emerge. Now, successful countries, successful communities, even successful individuals are less and less measured in terms of their worth and value and what you might call success by economic productivity, because you can be economically productive, but also destroy the environment. So it’s short term economic productivity.

And now that we’re putting a price, a value on the environment and not just seeing it as infinite, you know, as we see species become extinct, as we see natural areas become more limited, as we become more aware of the Earth as, I guess, an organism, you know, and as we move more towards one world, one people. It’s this breakthrough that came, I think, with looking at the Earth from space and seeing it for the first time as something beautiful, but also fragile and potentially vulnerable.

PEAHThis links in with re-orienting practises and behaviours by governments, corporations and civil society towards reversing climate deterioration. What would you recommend?

Kevany: In terms of practises and behaviours by governments, corporations and civil society towards reversing climate deterioration, it’s a complex issue. It sounds so simple. It sounds as if we should simply say this is what needs to be done in order to preserve the natural environment and these should be the policies.

What I’ve experienced, one thing I’ve experienced more than anything else is exposure to extreme poverty in the world and that’s, you know, up to perhaps some might say 90% of the world’s population. And what I have noticed, Daniele, in those environments is no one is going to spend more money for environmental protection. No one is going to switch to unleaded fuel if it’s more expensive. No one is going to stop using plastic bags if it’s essential to their survival. No one is going to spend more on the environment if it costs them the price of an extra loaf of bread, so to speak. So, in a way, these are the people.

These are the behaviours that are going to determine the success of any such policies. And so the policies themselves will not be effective, I think, until global poverty and inequality has been addressed. And, of course, that is not an easy thing to do.

Maybe that is an impossible thing to do.

 PEAHIn this connection, do you agree with statement whereby “What is good for nonhumans and the Earth is virtually always in the best interests of humans, given the profound interdependence of all life.”?

Kevany: Regarding this statement, ‘’What is good for non-humans, and the earth is virtually always in the best interest of humans, given the profound interdependence of all life’’, you know, I came across a quote from Marcus Aurelius, your countryman, Daniele, and it was put very simply, what is bad for the beehive is bad for the bees. Unquestionably, what is good for the earth is good for humans. 

PEAH: Aiming to fill the health and development gaps you are dealing with, which partners do you currently count on?

Kevany: In regards to the health and development gaps, what I would suggest, Daniele, is that there’s possibly a transition happening. The world has changed so much. When my dad was a public health professional, say, in the 1960s working for Pan-American Health Organization, and in those days, it was so clear that there was the developed world and the developing world, and the developed world did its best to help poor countries, what was called the Third World, to control irradicable or to control diseases that cures were available for. It was that simple. And that happened. And since then, it’s gotten more complex, you know HIV, TB, malaria, no easy way out. And the dynamic has also changed between the developed and the developing world.

I don’t think that distinction is there anymore. There are incredibly impoverished, poor, miserable places in rich countries. And there’s a lot of prosperity, even though it can be isolated in what was formerly known as the developing world. Everything has become a little bit blurred here in the 21st century. So what I would suggest, especially given the current funding environment, is that I don’t think counting on partners is the way forward. I think anyone can be a partner, and anyone can be a reliable partner. But the movement, I guess, is away from dependence on funding and more towards technical assistance. So bring in an expert, bring in a consultant, bring in someone who knows about health systems, and let them visit the clinics, let them visit the Ministry of Health, and let them talk to the administrators and offer, if asked, their suggestions on how things might be done differently, or modernized without reliance on investment, just using the skills that are there, using the infrastructures there, that is there using the traditional systems. And that is not going to cost people a huge amount. It’s not going to be reliant on funding. You’re not going to have to count on partners. It’s going to be internally reliant. And I think that’s maybe the best strategy for now.

PEAHThank you Dr. Kevany for the excellent work joining diplomacy and humanitarian commitment.

Kevany: Thank you as well, Daniele. Thank you for your recognition of the need to connect international relations, security, diplomacy, humanitarianism, development, and health.

 

 

Framing Health and Well-Being: a Positive Confrontation Between Life and Social Sciences as a Trigger/Engine for Public Health Challenges

IN A NUTSHELL
Author's note
What are the implications for the universal frameworks of Health in All Policies and the Social Determinants of Health as mechanisms in-between recent geo-political tensions. And how do these (future) developments impact on health and well-being of global citizens, communities and cities in need of basic supplies, food and water?

By Dr. Tomas Mainil

Phd, Ma, Msc, PD, Senior Lecturer/Researcher and Strategic Policy Analyst Breda University of Applied Sciences, the Netherlands

 

Framing Health and Well-Being

A Positive Confrontation Between Life and Social Sciences as a Trigger/Engine for Public Health Challenges

 

An innovative combination of life and social sciences – with the aid of disruptive technologies, such as AI, Lidar and Blockchain – can generate technological approaches to cater solutions for global patients and health professionals.  Both our own well-being as patients and our health systems could be influenced by a sustainable insertion of disruptive technologies, but only if these strategies are framed within the 16 UN sustainability goals.

Data and knowledge of patients and medical records which have been gathered in the past could aid to set up health data dashboards.  It is useful to argue what happens with patients (micro), societies (meso) and globally (macro) in relation to technology, exemplifying two directions: one scenario (A) which is sustainable for patients and health organizations and another scenario (B) which is framed within a more market driven development.

Micro-level

Scenario A: patients will be in the possibility to alter their state of illness or disease if local governing health bodies and organizations implement health in all policies in the near future and use disruptive technologies to support these treatment needs.

Scenario B: patients will suffer from market driven decision policies on the local level if disruptive technologies are going to enhance further commercialization of these health services.

Meso-level

Scenario A:  societies should be built on sustainable and well-defined health systems and clear defined rulings. This should be in place for the near future because of climate change: this is in relation to the responsibilities of the WHO and UN and their policy making.

Scenario B: full tension in societies on commercialization of health care, medical technologies and the commercial position of MDs. This will result in more lethal damages in a dangerous societal system

Macro-level

Scenario A: the needed change in human nature/health is not to conquer but to be aware that our own conception of life is systemized and should be framed towards inclusiveness.  Inclusiveness could mean a new road to dignified social and human capital, where also sustainable AI could enrich our joint goals as a society and global community.

Scenario B: Confrontations/economic tensions in healthcare could lead to lost lives, poor patient health trajectories and even worse: a lost sense of urgency.

 

It is clear that the UN and WHO should take responsibility as trans-national organizations to strive for universal coverage, to sustain support for local and global public health challenges and envision a path of policies as enablers for the urgent benefits for our growing populations across a globalized health and well-being system. Disruptive technologies should never shut down our human approach towards health, but are necessary to support decent public healthcare, on a local and global level.

Africa’s Health Systems after USAID Funding and the Road Ahead

IN A NUTSHELL
Author's note
For decades, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has been a cornerstone of global health support in Africa, channeling billions into combating infectious diseases, malnutrition, and strengthening healthcare infrastructure. Programs targeting HIV/AIDS, malaria, maternal health, and nutrition—such as PEPFAR and Feed the Future—have saved millions of lives. However, recent discussions about the potential termination of USAID funding raise critical questions: How will Africa cope? Is the continent prepared to sustain these vital health gains independently?

By Kirubel Workiye Gebretsadik

Medical Doctor, Ras Desta Damtew Memorial Hospital

Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

 Navigating a New Era

Africa’s Health Systems after USAID Funding and the Road Ahead

 

The Lifeline of USAID Funding

USAID’s contributions have been transformative. For example:

  • HIV/AIDS: PEPFAR has provided antiretroviral therapy to over 15 million Africans.
  • Malaria: Investments in bed nets and treatments helped reduce mortality by 44% since 2000.
  • Nutrition: Programs like Feed the Future improved food security for 23.4 million people.

These initiatives often fill gaps in underfunded national health budgets, particularly in fragile economies. Countries heavily reliant on aid, such as Ethiopia, Malawi and Mozambique, may feel the pinch acutely, while others with diversified funding streams could fare better.

Africa’s Preparedness: A Shift toward Self-Reliance

While the loss of USAID funding is a blow, Africa has been laying groundwork to reduce dependency:

  1. Domestic Health Financing:
    • Rwanda and Ghana now allocate over 15% of their budgets to healthcare (per the Abuja Declaration), investing in national health insurance and community-based care.
    • Kenya’s “Linda Mama” program offers free maternal health services, funded domestically.
  2. Regional Collaboration:
    • The Africa CDC, established in 2017, has strengthened outbreak responses, exemplified during COVID-19 and Ebola crises.
    • The African Union’s Partnerships for African Vaccine Manufacturing (PAVM) aims to produce 60% of the continent’s vaccines locally by 2040.
  3. Innovation and Technology:
    • Digital tools like Kenya’s M-Tiba (mobile health financing) and drone delivery of medicines in Ghana are bridging gaps in access.
    • Startups are tackling malnutrition with fortified foods, such as Nigeria’s Releaf Group, which processes nutrient-rich crops.
Challenges Ahead

Despite progress, hurdles persist:

  • Funding Gaps: Many nations struggle to mobilize domestic resources due to economic inequalities and debt burdens.
  • Infrastructure Deficits: Rural areas still lack clinics, labs, and trained personnel.
  • Political Instability: Conflicts in regions like the Sahel and Sudan disrupt health services.
  • Brain Drain: Medical professionals often emigrate for better opportunities, weakening local systems.
The Path Forward

The termination of USAID funding is a pivotal moment for Africa. While the continent has made strides in self-reliance, the transition requires nuanced strategies:

  • Sustainable Financing: Expanding health insurance and taxing sectors like extractive industries could boost domestic funding.
  • Strengthening Partnerships: Engaging diaspora communities, private sector actors, and regional blocs can foster resilience.
  • Advocacy for Equity: Global solidarity remains critical. Wealthier nations must honor commitments to climate and health financing, recognizing that disease knows no borders.

Africa’s journey toward health sovereignty is fraught with challenges but also brimming with innovation and determination. As the continent reimagines its future, the world must pivot from aid to equitable partnerships—because health security anywhere depends on solidarity everywhere. By investing in homegrown solutions and equitable systems, Africa can turn crisis into opportunity, ensuring health for all remains within reach.

 

__

By the same Author on PEAH

Stroke Awareness and Africa 

Neglected Tropical Diseases: Lessons for Future Pandemics and Global Health Preparedness

Forgone Health Care Among Patients With Cardiovascular Disease

UNMET HEALTHCARE

Malaria Eradication and Prevention through Innovation

ONE HEALTH ONE WORLD

Social Innovation in Healthcare

News Flash 606: Weekly Snapshot of Public Health Challenges

News Flash Links, as part of the research project PEAH (Policies for Equitable Access to Health), aim to focus on the latest challenges by trade and governments rules to equitable access to health in resource-limited settings

Loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta)

News Flash 606

Weekly Snapshot of Public Health Challenges

 

Pen’s Parade: The Stratospheric Heights of Inequality

New Price Reductions for Medicines to Treat Drug-Resistant TB

”Cultivating an Active Care for the World and With Those With Whom We Share It”  by George Lueddeke

New lawsuit challenges US foreign aid funding freeze

National Institutes of Health Move to Slash $9 Billion in US Biomedical Research Funding Provokes Outcry

Trump could remake USAID to promote fossil fuels

American chaos: standing up for health and medicine – The Lancet

People’s Health Dispatch Bulletin #94: The Trump effect in health

Vatican charity says Trump administration’s gutting of USAID is ‘reckless’ and could kill millions

Inklings | Thoughts on aid dependency amid the Trump chaos

Suspension of US support for several international organizations: a brutal wake-up call but also an opportunity for Africa to rethink health financing?

Which Countries Are Most Exposed to US Aid Cuts; And What Other Providers Can Do

US aid freeze deals blow to Uganda’s health, research

Life-saving HIV drugs missing in Africa as US halts aid

Will HIV Make a Comeback as Progress is Threatened?

Meeting registration: Updates ahead of INB13 Feb 14, 2025

Meeting registration: The Political Economy of Health Indicators and Data Feb 13, 2025

Global health R&D makes a strong investment case for Team Europe

Moving Toward Implementation of Responsible Artificial Intelligence in Health Care The European TRAIN Initiative

Women in science: Breaking barriers to advance health equity

Ending FGM Requires Strengthening Partnerships and Advocacy Efforts

Confronting the Neglect and Normalization of Chagas Disease in Bolivia

Polio beyond a medical problem

UNPO Stands in Solidarity with Tibetans and Uyghurs, Welcomes UN Investigation into China’s Human Rights Violations

MSF statements at WHO Executive Board 156th session

Is There an Ideal Payment Model That Enables Integrated Care: Searching for the Impossible?

WHO, St. Jude launch groundbreaking international delivery of childhood cancer medicines

New WHO Air Pollution Road Map Gets Strong Support; Member States Ask for Greater ‘Equity’ Focus in Climate Work

Shaping Conditions for Fair, Equitable and Enduring Climate Finance

WHO: Developing Countries call for changes in Climate and Health Draft Action Plan

 

 

 

Cultivating an Active Care for the World and With Those With Whom We Share It

IN A NUTSHELL
Editor's Note
By PEAH acknowledged partner Dr. George Lueddeke an announcement here  relating  to the terms of reference of underpinning  1 HOPE-TDR project implementation proposals. These are presently being evolved across several regions- Africa, Americas, Asia and Europe (with Middle East and Oceania engagement planned later this year).  The announcement may be timely in terms of current international uncertainties and unprecedented challenges

Implementing the

International One Health for One Planet Education &

Transdisciplinary Research Initiative

(1 HOPE-TDR)

 “CULTIVATING AN ACTIVE CARE FOR THE WORLD AND WITH THOSE WITH WHOM WE SHARE IT”

(UNESCO)

 

TERMS OF REFERENCE

1 HOPE-TDR Project Implementation Planning Teams

(Africa, Americas, Asia, Europe, Middle East, Oceania)

 

1.0 Preamble

After billions of years of evolution, in just a few decades we have come to an inevitable turning-point. While we have made significant scientific / technological progress, we have failed to safeguard life on the planet including ours (we are but one of about 8.5 million species).

Naturalist and broadcaster Sir David Attenborough reminds us: “The truth is: the natural world is changing. And we are totally dependent on that world. It provides our food, water and air. It is the most precious thing we have, and we need to defend it.”

It is evident that many lessons history has taught us over millennia have not been learned. While we have the cognitive and affective capacities for achieving a more harmonious world, we continue to have a two-dimensional rather than a three-dimensional view or “orbital perspective”: recognizing the complexity and interconnectedness of all life on the planet.

Global sustainability depends on ensuring that our human needs are compatible with those of our ecosystems – air, land, sea. This re-orientation necessitates “rising above the many issues that divide us and being part of something bigger” – shifting our worldview from human-centrism (‘it’s all about us’) to  embracing the ‘common good’  and global sustainability through  eco-centrism (‘it’s about all species in a shared environment’).

The One Health (and Wellbeing) concept (OHW) recognises the interconnection of all life in a shared environment and has emerged as a fundamental construct  to better understand the complex and unprecedented challenges facing us and finding viable  and sustainable ways to address these. As one example, the One Health High-Level Expert Panel (OHHLEP -UN FAO, UNEP, WHO, WOAH*) is committed to One Health as “an integrated, unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and optimise the health of humans, domestic and wild animals, plants and the wider environment (including ecosystems).”

Complementing the latter and informed by other system-wide initiatives, 1 HOPE-TDR also considers the wider context  – drawing, as examples,  on  Earth Charter International  principles and values,  the UN-2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), USAID –“extending assistance to countries recovering from disaster, escaping from poverty and engaging in democratic reforms,”  and P4H– “a global network for social health protection and health financing” with a view to gaining a better understanding of the root causes of the existential risks facing us along with finding short and longer-term solutions to help optimise global sustainability.

As former UN Secretary-General Ban-ki Moon reminded us: There is no Plan B, because we do not have a Planet B”. “New ways of thinking, learning and human engagement are no longer an option but a necessity as is cultivating “an active care for the world and with those with whom we share it” (UNESCO).

 

*FAO-UN Food and Agriculture Organisation, UNEP- Environmental Programme, WHO-World Health Organisation, WOAH-World Organisation for Animal Health

 

2.0 1 HOPE-TDR OVERVIEW

Mission

The 1 HOPE-TDR initiative (IPR)  refers to an evolving global network and an inclusive learning strategy. Its main aim is to support global sustainability by helping society to better understand the criticality of our relationship to each other, to other species, and to the environment to achieve “a more just, sustainable. and peaceful world.”

Rationales

The major problems of our time from climate change to biodiversity loss to inequities and geopolitical conflicts necessitate a change in our worldview shifting from our predominant human-centric mindset (‘it’s all about us’) to eco-centrism (‘it’s about all species and sustaining our ‘blue planet’!).

 Origin

1 HOPE-TDR stemmed  from  the publication, Survival: One Health, One Planet, One Future (2019/2020),  including ‘Ten Propositions for Global Sustainability.’

Proposition #7 

calls for “the unifying One Health and Wellbeing  concept (OHW) –

 ‘recognising the interdependence of humans, non-humans, and plants in a shared environment to be the cornerstone of education, research and societal institutions.’

 

By extension and application, the OHW concept/approach provides a strategic cohesive bond or glue that reinforces the interlinkages of all UN-2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) -targets and strategies -underpinned by the UN aim to achieve a “more just, peaceful and sustainable world.”

 

Preparation of 1 HOPE-TDR Project Proposals

 (Africa, Americas, Asia and Europe, Middle East, Oceania)

Further to discussions and developments to date, including 1 Hope-TDR in a Nutshell,   project planning team members* are asked to prepare capacity-building project proposals that focus on global sustainability informed by  the implementation of 1 HOPE-TDR strategies at sub-regional and by extrapolation regional levels.

New ways of thinking, learning and human engagement are key for capacity-building and global sustainability challenging our institutions and society to shift –

 Other principles and values

  • Compassion for the sanctity of all life

               (Earth Charter International)

  • Inclusivity –“leaving no one behind” : all life!

            (UNSDG and Survival: One Health, One Planet, One Future)

  • Ownership: regions ‘develop their own context – specific approach’

(P4H Network)

  • Planet ‘stewardship and the responsibility of humans to change behaviour’

(One Health High Level Expert Panel)

 

 3.0 1 HOPE-TDR Project Proposal Developments – Coordination

Recommended membership compositiondemonstrated expertise in field of study, community/govt/ business leadership and commitment to OHW & SDGs values and principles) 

Contributing to the development of 1 HOPE-TDR project proposals (sub-regions)

Universities / Colleges/ Schools

Sub-Regional Co-chairs – 2-tbc)

Membership (3 from each discipline area – 9 [equity and parity])

  • Biological/Life Sciences (Medicine: veterinary & human and from such areas as public health, global health, biology, environmental science, agricultural science, ecology…).
  • Natural / Physical Sciences (Earth sciences and from such areas as chemistry, physics, geography, manufacturing, mechanics…).
  • Social Sciences & Humanities (Education-Primary/Secondary / Associations/Teacher Training and from such areas as politics, economics, sociology, psychology, cultural anthropology…)

Affiliate Organisations

Membership (2 from each sector-8-tbc)

  • Civil Society, Government, Business and Partner Organisations focusing on planet sustainability

Advisory (tbc)

 4.0 Suggested 1 HOPE-TDR Initiative Implementation 

Project Development Phases

  1. Establish sub-regional consortia (steering and coordinating committees with representatives from sub-regions to enable strategic developments. (2025)
  2. Establish sub-regional country coordinating committees – participating institutions / organisations – to develop and take forward strategic developments especially localising initiatives. (2026)
  3. Establish regional ‘hubs’ to support #1 and #2 and liaise with global organisations. (2027)
  4. Evaluate #1- #3 and formulate recommendations (2027)

5.0 General Strategies

  • Mainstream OHW and the SDGs across societal sectors (education, research & innovation; workforce developments-health systems, govt. policy, business, community (esp. focusing on Youth/GenZ Engagement, Empowering Women & Disenfranchised)
  • Strengthen multi-sector collaboration and solutions by enabling OHW and the SDGs
  • Promote a future consciousness and accelerate preventive approaches identifying root causes and addressing global risks (e.g., climate change, peace and security, governance / accountability, AI…)
  • Provide synergies/alignment to allow different global regions to exchange knowledge and fact-based information on pressing socio-ecological development challenges under global and regional stressors.
  • Contribute to an international 1 HOPE-TDR advisory forum to guide and support strategic directions including “re-conceptualization of the university/higher education purpose and scope focusing on the development of an interconnected ecological knowledge system with a concern for the whole Earth – and beyond.” 
 For queries or further information:

Contact

George Lueddeke PhD

Global Lead, international One Health for One Planet Education and Transdisciplinary Research initiative

(1 HOPE-TDR)

(glueddeke@aol.com)

News Flash 605: Weekly Snapshot of Public Health Challenges

News Flash Links, as part of the research project PEAH (Policies for Equitable Access to Health), aim to focus on the latest challenges by trade and governments rules to equitable access to health in resource-limited settings

Red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii)

News Flash 605

Weekly Snapshot of Public Health Challenges

 

Registration: Dissemination event of PharmaChron project “Access to Essential Medicines at the Primary Health Care Level in Conflict-Affected Regions of Northern Syria.” 19 February 2025

EB 156: Opening address of Dr. Jerome Walcott (Chair)

How Should Health Care and Public Health Respond to the New US Administration?

Dear Secretary Rubio: You Are Right, Foreign Assistance Works. Please Resume It

Trump Administration poses an unprecedented threat to life-saving health programmes

Member States Pledge Support for WHO But Urge Diplomatic Efforts to Woo Back USA

Unraveling Progress: The US Exit From The WHO And Its Global Consequences

UN rights chief seeks $500 million in 2025, warning lives are at risk

MPP stands firm in its commitment to ensuring continued access to life-saving treatments

He’s promised to make America healthy. Experts fear he will do the opposite

HRR756. MICE USED TO VOTE; THEY ELECTED CAT GOVERNMENTS. (Tommy Douglas)

The Second Trump Administration and Development: The First 100 Days

U.S. Freeze On Foreign Aid a ‘Death Sentence’ for Africa

Scoop: UN sketches global map of mayhem from US aid freeze

The International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC) is seeking to appoint new Board members Application deadline extended until Friday, 14th February

Gender-sensitive macroeconomic policies in low- and middle-income economies

Strengthening alliances and building movements to end female genital mutilation

World TB Day 2025 Theme Announcement

Groundbreaking Ebola vaccination trial launches today in Uganda

Niger Becomes Africa’s First Country to Eliminate River Blindness

Evolving Epidemiology of Mpox in Africa in 2024

MSF renews call for immediate action to prevent death and starvation in Sudan

WHO: Cervical Cancer Resolution Overlooks Critical Treatment Disparities

World Cancer Day: hope, prevention, and treatment

The adverse public health effects of non-medical cannabis legalisation in Canada and the USA

Harnessing digital health to achieve equitable and efficient health systems

Digitalization of health care in low- and middle-income countries

Towards an inclusive digital health ecosystem

Swedish drug agency’s new pricing model surprises, concerns patient and pharma groups

EU animal welfare boss joins call for tougher standards in food trade

Can We Still Solve Climate Change?

Delhi pollution policy in doubt over crop burning data

AI monitors help Uganda tackle air pollution crisis

Most major polluters set to miss UN deadline for 2035 climate targets

Estimating future heat-related and cold-related mortality under climate change, demographic and adaptation scenarios in 854 European cities