The Dilemmas of Localization for Climate Action: The Struggles of Local NGOs in Accessing Global Platforms in Countries Like South Sudan

IN A NUTSHELL
Author's Note
Localization in climate action has been increasingly emphasized as a critical strategy for effective and sustainable responses to climate change, particularly in vulnerable regions like South Sudan. However, despite global commitments to empowering local actors, numerous challenges continue to hinder the meaningful participation of local NGOs in international climate discourse and funding mechanisms. 

This article explores the dilemmas surrounding localization, the barriers faced by local NGOs in accessing global platforms, and the implications for climate action in fragile contexts

By David Odukanga

WASH and Climate Change Advisor 

The Dilemmas of Localization for Climate Action

The Struggles of Local NGOs in Accessing Global Platforms in Countries Like South Sudan

 

The Promise of Localization in Climate Action

Localization aims to shift power, resources, and decision-making to local actors who are best positioned to understand and address the needs of their communities. In theory, this approach enhances the effectiveness, relevance, and sustainability of climate interventions. Global frameworks such as the Paris Agreement and initiatives like the Grand Bargain advocate for increased funding and support for local organizations. However, in practice, significant gaps remain between policy commitments and actual implementation.

Challenges Hindering Local NGOs’ Access to Global Platforms

  1. Funding Barriers: Local NGOs in South Sudan and similar countries struggle to access international climate finance due to stringent eligibility criteria, complex application processes, and a preference for larger international For instance, according to the 2023 South Sudan Humanitarian Response Plan, only 2% of climate adaptation funding was directly allocated to local organizations, with the majority going to international entities (OCHA, 2023).
  2. Capacity Gaps: Many local organizations have deep contextual knowledge but face technical and operational challenges that limit their ability to engage in global climate platforms. Reports indicate that 78% of South Sudanese NGOs lack sufficient financial and administrative capacity to meet international donor requirements (UNDP, 2022).
  3. Limited Representation in Decision-Making: International climate negotiations and high- level policy discussions are often dominated by governments, multilateral agencies, and well-resourced A review of South Sudan’s participation in COP28 showed that only 5% of the country’s delegation comprised local NGO representatives, limiting their influence on decision-making processes (UNFCCC, 2023).
  4. Power Imbalances and Structural Exclusion: Even when local NGOs are involved in climate discussions, they often face tokenistic engagement rather than genuine decision-making power. Large INGOs and donors tend to dictate priorities, sidelining local knowledge and priorities.
  5. Bureaucratic and Political Constraints: In fragile states like South Sudan, political instability and restrictive policies further complicate local NGOs’ operations. Governmental restrictions, cumbersome registration processes, and bureaucratic hurdles limit their ability to receive international funding and collaborate with global partners.

Impacts on Climate Action in South Sudan

The exclusion of local NGOs from global climate platforms has dire consequences for climate action in South Sudan and similar countries. It results in:

  • Misaligned Priorities: Climate interventions often fail to reflect the actual needs and realities of affected communities.
  • Reduced Effectiveness: The reliance on external actors leads to inefficient project implementation, as local organizations are better suited to deliver context-specific
  • Erosion of Local Agency: The marginalization of local NGOs perpetuates dependency on international actors, preventing long-term sustainability and resilience building.
  • Missed Opportunities for Innovation: Many local NGOs develop innovative, indigenous climate adaptation strategies, but their lack of access to global platforms prevents the sharing and scaling up of these solutions.
Bridging the Gap

Recommendations for Meaningful Localization

To address these dilemmas, a shift in global climate governance and funding mechanisms is needed. Key recommendations include:

  • Increasing Direct Funding: International donors should simplify application processes and allocate more direct funding to local NGOs to enhance their capacity and autonomy.
  • Capacity Strengthening Initiatives: Investing in training and mentorship programs can empower local NGOs to navigate global climate finance and advocacy spaces effectively.
  • Ensuring Inclusive Representation: Climate summits and decision-making bodies should allocate seats for local actors, ensuring their voices influence global climate policies.
  • Reforming Bureaucratic Processes: Governments and international institutions should reduce bureaucratic red tape that hinders local NGOs from accessing funds and participating in global discussions.
  • Enhancing Partnerships and Collaboration: Strengthening partnerships between local NGOs, INGOs, and global institutions can create more equitable power dynamics and knowledge exchange.

Conclusion

Localization is essential for effective climate action, yet systemic barriers continue to exclude local NGOs from global platforms. Addressing these challenges requires genuine commitment from international actors, policymakers, and donors to shift power, resources, and decision-making to those most affected by climate change. Only by overcoming these dilemmas can countries like South Sudan harness the full potential of local expertise to build climate resilience and sustainable development pathways.

 

References

  • OCHA (2023). South Sudan Humanitarian Response United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.
  • UNDP (2022). Capacity Needs Assessment of Local NGOs in South United Nations Development Programme.
  • UNFCCC (2023). COP28 Participation Report: South Sudan United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

 

__

By the same Author on PEAH

The Nexus Between Climate Change, Security Impact on Public Health, and WASH in South Sudan