Proteggere i Diritti Terrieri delle Comunità Indigene per Salvare il Pianeta

‘Riconoscere i diritti terrieri delle comunità locali e indigene significa rispettare i diritti umani di circa due miliardi e mezzo di persone, e inoltre ridurre i conflitti, combattere il cambiamento climatico e proteggere ed espandere gli importanti,fragili ecosistemi di Madre Terra’

Victoria Tauli-Corpuz,UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples

MINOLTA DIGITAL CAMERA

by Daniele Dionisio

Membro, European Parliament Working Group on Innovation, Access to Medicines and Poverty-Related Diseases

Responsabile del Progetto Policies for Equitable Access to Health – PEAH 

Proteggere i Diritti Terrieri delle Comunità Indigene per Salvare il Pianeta

 

Nel marzo 2016 Oxfam, International Land Coalition e Rights and Resources Initiative lanciarono il report  ‘Common Ground: Securing Land Rights and Safeguarding the Earth’ quale richiamo all’azione per la tutela dei diritti terrieri delle comunità locali e indigene. Esigenza quanto mai impellente in un mondo in cui, a dispetto dell’uso proprietario e abituale di oltre il 50% delle terre emerse del pianeta, due miliardi e mezzo di uomini e donne hanno diritti riconosciuti su solo un quinto di esse. I cinque miliardi di ettari rimanenti restano vulnerabili all’accaparramento/sequestro da parte di governi e potenti corporazioni.

Questa enorme disparità è tra le concause della violazione e privazione dei diritti civili e umani, della povertà, e dei focolai di conflitto nelle aree geografiche coinvolte.

Queste realtà stridono di fronte all’ evidenza del ruolo del riconoscimento dei diritti terrieri delle comunità nel preservare le diversità culturali e contrastare la povertà e la fame, l’instabilità politica e i mutamenti climatici, in linea con lo spirito dei Sustainable Development Goals delle Nazioni Unite e dell’Accordo di Parigi sul clima.

Purtroppo, nonostante alcuni progressi, gli impegni al rispetto dei diritti terrieri delle popolazioni si sono rivelati in genere vuote promesse.  E la realtà corrente insegna che le risorse forestali, idriche, di pascolo e minerarie continuano ad essere oggetto di progetti di investimento e sviluppo implicanti lo spostamento altrove delle comunità locali.

Il numero crescente di persone uccise perché difendevano la loro terra testimonia l’indicibile violenza su quanti si vedono negata ogni partecipazione in decisioni coinvolgenti le loro terre e le loro vite.

In particolare le donne risentono della violazione di questi diritti in termini di ostacolo al conseguimento di un ruolo socialmente paritario con l’uomo. Non è un caso che in Tanzania le donne con diritti sicuri sulla propria terra vantano introiti economici tre volte superiori rispetto a quelle senza; e che in India la certezza del diritto sulla terra ha mostrato una positiva correlazione con la forte riduzione dei casi di violenza domestica.

Fatti certi:

  • In Africa mancano documenti sicuri di proprietà per il 90% dei terreni rurali; di conseguenza le comunità locali sono estremamente vulnerabili alla sottrazione/accaparramento di terre.
  • Sicuri diritti terrieri sono un diritto umano, specialmente per le popolazioni indigene alle quali la legislazione internazionale riconosce il diritto di accesso e controllo sulla propria terra abituale.
  • Sicuri diritti terrieri sono un ‘sine qua non’ per lo sviluppo. Essi consentono l’aumento del reddito e un ventaglio di benefici sociali estesi oltre i confini delle singole comunità. I Paesi tesi all’implementazione dei diritti terrieri hanno positivi ritorni in termini di riduzione della fame e maggiore e più equa crescita economica.
  • L’eguaglianza di genere nella proprietà terriera darebbe maggior potere e influenza alle donne circa i modi, gli esiti e le pratiche di coltivazione. Secondo la FAO una maggiore gestione della terra da parte delle donne si tradurrebbe in maggiori raccolti (circa il 20-30% in più) con riduzione potenziale del 10-20% delle persone denutrite su scala mondiale.
  • Le foreste gestite dalle comunità indigene e locali immagazzinano 37.7 miliardi di tonnellate di carbone – più delle emissioni mondiali 2013 di CO2 da combustione di carburanti fossili e processi industriali.
  • Secondo il Programma per l’Ambiente delle Nazioni Unite (UNEP) la pastorizia è ‘one of the most sustainable food systems on the planet […] between two and 10 times more productive per unit of land than the capital-intensive alternatives that have been put forward’.
  • Sicuri diritti terrieri delle comunità locali e indigene sono in grado di prevenire l’estinzione di più di quattromila idiomi.

Raccomandazioni per l’azione

Il report in oggetto conclude con una serie di raccomandazioni, fra le quali:

  • La richiesta ai governi di implementare la UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, la ILO Convention No. 169, la UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders, e le UN Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests. Inoltre, di dichiarare tolleranza zero su ogni accaparramento/sequestro di terre e di includere la protezione dei diritti (soprattutto per popolazioni dipendenti dalle foreste, produttori agricoli di piccola-media scala, pescatori e pastori) quale pilastro per le strategie di sviluppo nazionale comprese quelle correlate al clima, all’agricoltura, alla tutela ambientale, alle fonti energetiche, al turismo, alla crescita economica e al commercio.
  • La richiesta ai Parlamenti di migliorare o introdurre specifiche legislazioni e di allocare adeguati budgets per garantire il diritto alla terra delle comunità indigene e locali.
  • La richiesta alle corporazioni e istituzioni finanziarie internazionali di sviluppare e implementare politiche (e meccanismi di reclamo)per evitare, ridurre, mitigare e sanare ogni impatto diretto e indiretto sulle terre e risorse naturali delle comunità locali e indigene.
  • La richiesta all’UN High Level Political Forum di adottare almeno un indicatore per la misura dei progressi di settore nel contesto dell’Agenda 2030, e di impegnarsi a sostenere i diritti delle comunità locali e indigene nell’ambito dei Sustainable Development Goals.
  • L’invito alle comunità locali e indigene a rafforzare le loro istituzioni e capacità, a sostenere la partecipazione egualitaria delle donne nella difesa della terra e delle risorse, e ad attivare alleanze per contrastare efficacemente le minacce.

 

PER APPROFONDIRE 

Common Ground: Securing Land Rights and Safeguarding the Earth https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/bp-common-ground-land-rights-020316-en_0.pdf 

The International Land Coalition (ILC) www.landcoalition.org

Oxfam www.oxfam.org

The Rights and Resources Initiative (RRI) www.rightsandresources.org

United Nations: Sustainable Development Goals http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/

Paris Climate Agreement http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php

Land grabbing https://www.oxfamamerica.org/take-action/campaign/food-farming-and-hunger/land-grabs/

2016: a Year in Review through PEAH Contributors’ Stands

Authoritative insights by 2016 PEAH external contributors added steam to debate on how to settle the conflicting issues that still impair equitable access to health by discriminated population settings worldwide

MINOLTA DIGITAL CAMERA

by  Daniele Dionisio*

PEAH – Policies for Equitable Access to Health 

2016: a Year in Review through PEAH Contributors’ Stands

 

Now that 2016 just came to its end, I wish to thank the top thinkers and academics who enthusiastically contributed articles over the year. Their authoritative insights meant a lot to PEAH scope while adding steam to debate on how to settle the conflicting issues that still impair equitable access to health by discriminated population settings worldwide.

Find out below a list of summaries and relevant links:

Denis Joseph Bukenya, Human Rights Research Documentation Centre (HURIC) Kampala, Uganda, pointed out that….As a matter of life and death, governments in the LDC sector need to strive to ensure that they develop effective health policies including development of essential medicines lists in a bid to improve access to health care.  Also they need to live up their individual and collective commitments and adopt a human rights based approach to access to all medicines, not only essential medicines

As regards this, a couple of articles [here and here] by Taye Tolera Balcha, Director General Armauer Hansen Institute (AHRI), Ethiopia, reminded us that… Although Ethiopia’s health care is grounded in equity principles and health outcomes have shown considerable improvements during the past 20 years, substantial challenges persist. Indeed, though equal access to essential health services for those in equal need has been largely ensured, equal utilization of health care for them and equal health outcomes have not been attained yet. Systematic disparities in the burden of diseases, service uptake and health outcomes prevail between communities, particularly arising from differences in places of residence. In the face of this, a range of diverse initiatives have been taken by the Ministry of Health to mend the chasm in health service uptake and health outcomes between the regions…and thatExcellent partnership between the government, key stakeholders, and the community has helped Ethiopia rise to the tectonic challenge of HIV. Since 1990, more than 90% reduction in new HIV infection has been recorded. Survival of HIV-positive individuals has substantially improved. At present, about 70% of HIV-positive people in the country know their status and 65% are on treatment…

As underlined by Alex Henriquez, Msc. Health Systems and Public Policy at the University of Edinburgh,In LMICs where access to medicines is essential to guarantee the health systems’ capacity to address people’s health needs, the inefficient fragmentation of supply chains is one of the main factors that increase the costs of medicines. Introducing a pre-wholesaler could help improve this inefficiency and reduce costs…

As regards these issues, the article by Junior Bazile, Moderator of the HIV Treatment and Prevention Community on Global Health Delivery Online; Global Health Delivery Project at Harvard University, dealt with the fact that…HIV-infected women in serodiscordant partnerships in African countries experience relationship stress due to low socioeconomic status, gender-related power dynamics and pressure to have children with their current partner to ‘bind’ the relationship. These stressors may influence ART adherence. As biomedical interventions (ART, PrEP, VMMC) are scaled up, couple-focused interventions including shared decision making, risk-reduction counseling, mutual adherence support, safer conception and economic empowerment could improve relationship and treatment outcomes in serodiscordant partnerships…

What’s more, the analysis co-authored by Eloan Pinheiro, Consultant in Public Health Policy, Lucia Brum, Renata Reis and Juan-Carlos Cubides, Médecins Sans Frontières-Brazil contended that…The response to Chagas disease still needs inclusive protocols, sustainable and adequate financing and does not have a robust portfolio of investigation of new treatments and diagnosis. Beyond that, production capacity and supply of Benznidazole (BZN) medication is far from being minimally sufficient. The price factor also strongly impacts access to medication. A point deserving attention in the analysis of BZN’s prices is the need, as in the response to other diseases in general, to maintain competition as a factor of market regulation…

The article by Plaxcedes Chiwire, Deputy Director, Strategic Planning Unit at Western Cape Department of Health, South Africa, turned the spotlight on evidence that …South Africa has a lot of improvements to make in terms of population’s physical accessibility, financial protection and acceptability of the current public health care system. The National Health Insurance offers hope to the disadvantaged but it will not be ready anytime soon leaving the current health care arrangements with their own vulnerability needing continued revamping. The government may need to stop being reactive but proactive in addressing the inequality that is fuelling the lack of access for a majority of the population…

In unison, Enrique Restoy, Senior Technical Advisor: Human Rights at the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, highlighted that…The history of the Equitable Access Initiative (EAI) is so far short, but complex. It was a seemingly straight forward proposition initiated by the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria to find fairer alternatives to decisions on country eligibility for external financing for health solely based on economic income. However, since its launch in 2014, the initiative has lived five draft reports, the front opposition of over 200 global civil society organisations, and a mysterious descent into near secrecy. In the meantime, the main providers of Official Development Assistance (ODA) have increased their sole reliance on economic income to justify their pulling out from an ever greater number of countries. As the numbers of poorer and marginalised people living in so called middle-income countries being abandoned by ODA skyrocket, never before were the premises behind the EAI more relevant. Yet, as the EAI has just produced what should be its final report, this op-ed enquiries the validity of the EAI proposition from the point of view of the key principle of equality in the access to health. The paper concludes that despite its stated intentions, the EAI is so far failing to deliver on proposing alternatives that guarantee equality in access to health. This added to criticism as to the lack of transparency and inclusiveness of the initiative and the limited leverage it has had to change the status quo, invite to a profound reflection as to its current validity and relevance…

As regards antimicrobial resistance, Shila Kaur, Coordinator Health Action International Asia Pacific (HAIAP), affirmed  that…The review of the Global Action Plan for Antimicrobial Resistance at the upcoming (23-28 May 2016) WHA must consider the following: 1) More attention has to be focussed on public health measures that promote conservation and restoring of existing AB effectiveness. The principles espoused at Alma Ata in the Declaration on Health For All chart the path and apply to tackling ABR. Improvements in water and sanitation cannot be overlooked as important components of the primary health care (PHC) approach; 2) Other approaches to infection control and treatment are necessary to retain the effectiveness of current and emerging AB. These include vaccines (human and animal), diagnostic technologies and complementary and alternative technologies such as bacteriophages. Sub-therapeutic use of antibiotics in animal farming and agriculture must be phased out; 3) New AB while important must be affordable and accessible in LMICs. They must be available to the poorest of the poor. Their availability only in high income countries will not help the global response…

And this occurs at a time when, as argued by Meri Koivusalo, Senior Researcher on Health Policy at National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki While European citizens have been asked to trust on Commission and Member States to negotiate agreements which will not compromise health systems and social security, the reality so far falls short of this aim. In this paper the focus is on general textual parts where responsibility is mostly with Commission. Unfortunately what is promised has not been delivered and there remains substantial room for improvement. European Commission has also some explanation to do in terms of why European Unions’ own proposals have compromised so much in the sensitive areas of health services and social security… 

From a complementary perspective, Ted Schrecker, professor of Global Health Policy, and Clare Bambra, professor of Public Health Geography, Durham University, England maintained that Conditionalities attached to loans from the World Bank and IMF were among the key negative influences  on health and its social determinants between 1980 and 2000 in many of the more than 75 low- and middle-income countries in which they were applied. Best available evidence suggests that this ‘neoliberal epidemics’ era is not over. In the future, neoliberalism is likely to reflect the erosion of territorial divisions between core and periphery, or the global North and the global South, in the world economy…

To the point, Claudio Schuftan, People’s Health Movement-PHM, provided a lot of forward-looking reflections stressing that…Globalization creates wealth for the few and depresses local wages and conditions of employment for the many. Globalization has brought about a shift in power: the nation state has weakened and there is a reduction in social accountability. This makes sovereign states row rather than steer in the process of development, i.e. if countries do not intensely participate in this paradigm set by the North, they are “out”. As a consequence, the poor countries’ very right to development is threatened by this unrelenting liberalization/globalization process. Globalization has put the fate of those many in the hands of large corporations. Although the corporocracy (or corporarchy of Robin Sharp) very well knows the negative effects of Globalization, few of them are committed to change. They tend to ignore the root causes of the social problems they see as patently as everyone else, but seldom address the negative social impacts of their activities. Since they lack the openness and transparency required, they pay only lip service to change and seldom change their practices (or change them in very marginal ways)…

On a complementary wavelength, the article by Laura LeMoon, Disease Research & Intervention Specialist at King Co. Public Health Seattle USA, emphasized that …human trafficking activists want nothing to do with a sex worker’s rights based approach as they believe the existence of prostitution is to blame for the plight of forced labor, and sex worker’s want nothing to do with trafficking activists out of a need to distance themselves from anti-trafficking activists (at times) very punitive movement….these two realities are often dealt with by policy makers and activists alike as being mutually exclusive, when they are in fact, not…

On her part, Raffaella Ravinetto, Antwerp Institute of Tropical Medicine, pointed out that…The WHO and ICH (International Conference for Harmonization) GCP codes have not been updated since 1995 and 1996 respectively. Currently, a partial revision of the ICH GCP code is ongoing, but the update process does not seem sufficiently inclusive. If GCP codes are meant to set standards pertinent and applicable at global level, then a more comprehensive revision is needed, characterized by more transparency and more inclusiveness together with adequate representation of researchers, sponsors, regulators and ethical reviewers from LMICs…

Meanwhile, Fifa Rahman Policy Consultant at Malaysian AIDS Council, stressed that…Biologics is the future of medicines, and PhRMA is preparing for the next wave of IP to suit the changing medicines landscape….that it is based on the idea that maximalist IP is needed to drive innovation of new medicines.  Unfortunately, most of the public health exceptions interred in today’s trade agreements are… difficult for governments to employ in protection of their public health policies. This is because these exceptions require that the public health measures in question be ‘not more trade restrictive than necessary’ or that they are not disguised barriers to trade. The assertion that trade as is does not trump public health is disingenuous and the new biologics market exclusivity provisions indicate a new and perilous trend… to delay entry of biosimilars into the market… 

Relevantly, PEAH posted a comment by Chase Perfect, (MA, MsPH) Access to Medicines Policy Officer, HIV/HCV Drug Affordability Project Coalition Plus, and Fifa Rahman on a recent article ‘A Dose of the TPP’s Medicine – Why U.S. Trade Deals Havent Exported U.S. Drug Prices’ authored by Thomas J. Bollyky, Senior Fellow for Global Health, Economics, and Development at the U.S. Council on Foreign Relations.

To the point, Roberto De Vogli, School of Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, maintained thatThe recognition that the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, or TTIP, prioritized the “right to profit” of transnational corporations over the “right to health” of citizens deeply affected people’s sense of justice. It is exactly for this reason that it triggered such widespread civic protest that has been decisive in stopping the fast-track approval of the TTIP…

In this context, the article by Mohga Kamal-Yanni, Senior Health and HIV Policy Advisor, Oxfam GB, Editor ‘Global Health Check’, remarked that…The report by the United Nations (UN) High-Level Panel (HLP) on Access to Medicines went public on 14 September. Concerted efforts are now needed for the UN system and member states to adopt and implement the HLP recommendations. Otherwise the report will simply end up gathering dust on some shelves in a UN office…

Under these circumstances, the article by Iris Borowy, professor of History at Shanghai University, College of Liberal Arts, tackled the challenges to global health from a multi-pronged, entwining perspective. She alerted that… A full assessment of the SDGs, let alone of their implementation, will not be possible for some time. What is clear enough is that they differ from the MDGs and from most development efforts of the last decades in two important aspects: 1) They approach development as a global activity, involving all countries, as opposed to an area defined by deficiencies in low-income countries in the Global South; 2) They address numerous aspects where developmental improvements have been promised before but whose ongoing trends are uncertain or downright negative, such as climate change, global arms expenditures, deforestation, desertification, waste production or road traffic deaths…

From a different viewpoint, the article by Jin Hee Kim, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Michael Schwandt, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, and Lawrence C. Loh, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto and Director of Programs at The 53rd Week Ltd, analyzed …four key areas of public health and preventive medicine practice portrayed by the film ‘Contagion’: infectious disease transmission dynamics, the role of public health physicians, the interface between clinical practice and public health, and the role of social media in health promotion. The findings presented here promote an understanding of how the film represents these topics and illustrates the potential benefits to public health as a discipline arising from popular media depictions…

Last but not least, the piece by Corie Leifer, Project and Department Assistant at Phillips-Medisize, presented  itself as…an exploration of some possible answers to the confounding question why do some American citizens not support universal health care, including some misconceptions and interesting opinions. As such, it will not explore health care as a right or pros and cons of universal health care. Rather, its scope is limited to expressing reasons given by a few people for not supporting universal health care in the United States of America…

As an useful addition to the articles featured here, PEAH was pleased to post an interview with Dr. Sumedha Kushwaha and Dr. Manasvi Bawa Behl, as the General Secretary/Founder and the President of ATTAC – Aim to Terminate Tobacco and Cancer – Society. 

PEAH also interviewed Christiane Fischer as the founder and medical managing director at MEZIS.

The contributions highlighted above add to PEAH internal articles published throughout the year. Find below the relevant links:

Secondhand Smoke in Lawless Japan

What Ebola has Taught Us to Counter Mismanagement of Epidemic Outbreaks

Female Genital Mutilation in Nigeria: is it over?

Illegal Migrant Status and the Littleness of the European Health System

Gaza Strip: the Press of War on People’s Health

Rio de Janeiro Olympic Games: Mixed Blessing in Badly Running Country

Streamlining R&D Core Areas for Global Health Reporting

International Pressure on India’s Drug Industry: The Hide-and-Seek Game of Modi’s Administration

Access to Medicines Report, Green Light to Action

Kenya in a Bad Shape about Open Defecation Free Goal

WHO Makes Headway in Hepatitis C Treatment Access Campaign

Domestic Policies for Trade to Uphold the Right to Health

 

 

—————————————————————————

*Daniele Dionisio is a member of the European Parliament Working Group on Innovation, Access to Medicines and Poverty-Related Diseases. He is an advisor for “Medicines for the Developing Countries” for the Italian Society for Infectious and Tropical Diseases (SIMIT), and former director of the Infectious Disease Division at the Pistoia City Hospital (Italy). Dionisio is Head of the research project  PEAH – Policies for Equitable Access to Health. He may be reached at d.dionisio@tiscali.it  https://twitter.com/DanieleDionisio 

 

Breaking News: Link 219

Breaking News Links, as part of the research project PEAH (Policies for Equitable Access to Health), aim to focus on the latest challenges by trade and governments rules to equitable access to health in resource-limited settings

DSCN1778

Breaking News: Link 219

 

For Better or Worse, Politics Define 2016 Top Global Health Moments 

Could Pfizer’s record fine for unfair prices change the industry’s practices? 

A Look At The UNAIDS Board Debate On IP And Medicines; Outcome Fell Short For Some 

SCP25: South Africa’s Experience Related to the Topic of Access to Medicines 

Universal Health Coverage—looking to the future 

Universal Health Coverage Is a Potent Vote Winner 

UHC Day in the North: sequencing the battle of hearts and minds 

E-health should not exacerbate existing inequalities, NGO warns 

PCB39: Eight hour drafting session charts future course for UNAIDS work program on Intellectual Property and the UN HLP 

António Guterres set to be sworn in as next UN Secretary-General 

EU, Canada Meet To Discuss A New Model For Investor-State Trade Disputes 

Report: Lobbyists heavily influencing TiSA negotiations 

European mayors meet in the Vatican to solve the refugee crisis 

New online portal helps World Health Organization track global access to universal health coverage 

The forgotten humanitarian crisis: What should we do with the Rohingya refugees? 

Are We Finally Making Significant Progress in the Global Refugee Crisis? 

Gates Foundation to increase humanitarian spending on refugees 

Cancer’s deadly toll grows in less developed countries as new cases increase globally 

Targeting the Young: A Corporate Funder’s Campus Giving to Cut Tobacco Use 

In the Fight against AIDS, People Who Inject Drugs Are Being Left Behind 

Progress on malaria deaths at risk without big boost in funding, UN warns 

‘Evolutions and revolutions’ in chronic disease care 

McGill Summer Institute in Infectious Diseases and Global Health:  June 12-23, 2017, McGill University Montreal, Quebec, Canada  

US: The Costs And Benefits Of Health Spending In 2015 

The US environmental movement needs a new message 

How to make a profit from defeating climate change 

EU Commission: International ocean governance: an agenda for the future of our oceans 

As the Fossil Fuel Divestment Movement Gains Steam, It’s Getting Harder for Foundations to Ignore 

Commentary: Cuba, a model of sustainable agriculture towards global food security 

Agricultural inputs remain decisive in farm profitability 

Mapped: The countries doing most to protect their land 

Why is Africa’s Civil Society under Siege? 

 

 

Breaking News: Link 218

Breaking News Links, as part of the research project PEAH (Policies for Equitable Access to Health), aim to focus on the latest challenges by trade and governments rules to equitable access to health in resource-limited settings

DSCN1778

Breaking News: Link 218

 

Parliament committee gives CETA thumbs down 

‘TTIP may come back from the dead,’ warns expert 

TPP May Be Dead – But Its Impact Lingers 

Dominica Accepts TRIPS Health Amendment; Two More To Go?

Want “Good Pharma?” One Example of What That May Look Like 

Els Torreele Named Executive Director Of Global MSF Access Campaign 

UNAIDS Board Considers Recommendations On Access To Medicines 

RCEP trade deal negotiators must reject terms that would harm access to medicines 

RCEP IP chapter analysis 

ANDI Newsletter – December 05, 2016 

New Momentum for a Key Funder Collaborative Looking Upstream on Health 

Taking Stock Of Health Reform: Where We’ve Been, Where We’re Going 

How the U.S. should change its approach to global health 

Trump Plan To Increase Health Savings Accounts Should Ensure That They Do Not Only Benefit The Wealthy And Healthy 

India’s baseless foreign contribution bans block aid to poorest children 

How to maintain momentum on nutrition and early childhood development 

18 Diseases The World Has Turned Its Back On 

Madagascar: Halting pig-transmitted tapeworm 

How You Can Help Stamp Out A Deadly Disease 

A Zika vaccine is being developed at warp speed, but will there be a market for it? 

Yellow Fever Epidemic in Africa Shows Gaps in Vaccine Pipeline 

Kenya applies to pilot new malaria vaccine testing 

How epidemics take lives and bring global health into focus 

Promoting the sustainable development goals with “win–win” regulations in food and agricultural trade 

The Africa Free Trade Initiative: a stepping stone for sustainable development in Africa? 

African Economic Conference closes with call for agriculture to be at the centre of Africa’s development 

African policymakers get new, reliable climate data 

African Governments Urged to Aid Millions Uprooted From Homes in 2015  

UN agency urges EU to adopt stronger and more pro-active approach on refugees 

Human Rights Reader 401 

Violence against women and girls: enough is enough

Breaking News: Link 217

Breaking News Links, as part of the research project PEAH (Policies for Equitable Access to Health), aim to focus on the latest challenges by trade and governments rules to equitable access to health in resource-limited settings

DSCN1778

Breaking News: Link 217

 

Towards Equity in Health: Researchers Take Stock 

European and Canadian civil society groups call for rejection of CETA 

Protecting health in trade agreements : a challenge to Japan’s role in global health 

Sandoz and Beximco Pharmaceuticals Join the Medicines Patent Pool’s Growing Network of Generic Manufacturing Partners 

Drug companies test out new strategies for improving access in poor countries 

World AIDS Day 2016 

WHO global health days: AIDS infographics 

UNAIDS: Get on the Fast Track: the life-cycle approach to HIV 

‘Could HIV be the Youngest Disease to be Eliminated? The Experience of Ethiopia’ by Taye Tolera Balcha 

DNDi: TOWARDS ENDING THE NEGLECT OF PAEDIATRIC HIV? 

UNICEF: More Funds Needed to Fight Teen HIV 

New analysis: large pharmaceutical companies are developing five HIV/AIDS medicines for children 

At last, an HIV prevention tool women can control? 

Why Can’t We Bring Down The Number Of New HIV Cases? 

UN health agency issues new guidelines on HIV self-testing 

Can Investing in Rapid Self-Testing Disrupt the HIV/AIDS Mortality Curve? 

Time to be efficient: HIV/AIDS in the Latin America and the Caribbean 

Martin Shkreli: Australian boys recreate life-saving drug 

A Killer Disease Might Be Nearing The End Of Its Deadly Run 

In Bolivia, health workers use cell phones to eradicate Chagas disease 

Will 10 Million People Die a Year due to Antimicrobial Resistance by 2050? 

‘Kenya in a Bad Shape about Open Defecation Free Goal’ by Pietro Dionisio 

Analysis: A paradigm change at the IMF? 

UNPO newsletter: November 2016 edition 

Analysis: Who will now lead the fight on climate change? 

Climate change and the coming ‘humanitarian crisis of epic proportions’ 

Why the EIB should not deal with the migration crisis 

UN chief apologises for Haiti cholera, six years later 

President-Elect Trump Selects Price For HHS And Verma For CMS 

Fiscal Devolution and Health Financing Reform: Lessons for India from Brazil, China, and Mexico 

Could HIV be the Youngest Disease to be Eliminated? The Experience of Ethiopia

Excellent partnership between the government, key stakeholders, and the community has helped Ethiopia rise to the tectonic challenge of HIV. Since 1990, more than 90% reduction in new HIV infection has been recorded. Survival of HIV-positive individuals has substantially improved. At present, about 70% of HIV-positive people in the country know their status and 65% are on treatment

Taye Balcha

by Taye Tolera Balcha, MD, MPH, PhD

Director General, Armauer Hansen Institute (AHRI)

Could HIV be the Youngest Disease to be Eliminated? The Experience of Ethiopia

 

About 100 million people live in Ethiopia. Of these, three-quarters of a million are HIV-positive. National HIV prevalence among pregnant women showed significant decline, from 5.3% in 2005 to less than 1% today. Implementation of combination of interventions at community and health facility levels is the driving force for this unprecedented drop. Even now, there is a wide variation in HIV prevalence between different geographies and population groups in the country. Regions like Gambella and population groups including female sex workers have substantially higher rate of the disease than the rest of the regions and population groups in the country, respectively. Further, some diseases are traditionally used as surrogate markers of HIV infection. About 10% of tuberculosis patients nationwide, for instance, are HIV-positive. While the major behavioral driver of the epidemic is unsafe sexual practice, young women and girls are excessively affected.

What worked well in Ethiopia?

A combination of tailored HIV prevention strategies were implemented among diverse population groups. Early on, regular sessions of community conversations were conducted at each village in the country. The core messages in the late 90s and early 2000s were HIV prevention, voluntary counseling and testing, and fighting stigma and discrimination among positives. As treatment was practically out of reach, clinicians were able to treat only few opportunistic infections as the disease progresses ensuing mostly death.

Concurrent with major global advances in the field of HIV, however, HIV messages in Ethiopia showed significant evolution. The Health Extension Workers (HEWs), anchored within each community since 2004, repurposed the messages adding the newfound benefits of getting tested and linkage to care and treatment for positives. This was a monumental development in the field which turned HIV from a capital punishment to a chronic disease. It not only dented the upward spiral of the pandemic, but assured citizens that HIV was no more considered a national anxiety.

While the development of HIV treatment was a game changer in its own right, we are far from ending AIDS for good. Recently, an organized community movement, Health Development Army (HDA), took charge of their own health, fighting public health threats including HIV. Several communities in the country established Community Care Coalition (CCC) as a mechanism for nutritional and other support for HIV-positive members of their communities. CCC is a component of broader Solidarity Fund established by HDAs aiming at covering everyone in the community with available health and related interventions.

Since community systems are not robust in urban settings, health facilities play crucial role in HIV prevention and early care and treatment. Also, the roles of HIV-positive individuals and associations in HIV prevention, care and treatment is much more amplified in urban settings. Matching an accelerated industrialization, development projects are heavily engaged in HIV prevention and treatment efforts targeting their workforce. In this regard, a dynamic partnership between the health sector and an array of sectors engaged in development has been proved vital to intercept HIV transmission and provide treatment for positives, and as a consequence minimize productivity loss due to the disease.

HIV care and treatment

Like several other low-income countries, Ethiopia scaled up antiretroviral treatment (ART) in 2005. In 2006, the access to treatment was further expanded involving hundreds of health centres mainly staffed by non-physician clinicians. Concurrently, Ethiopia rolled out coordination and networking mechanisms for HIV treatment monitoring laboratory facilities to track disease progression and response to treatment. Free diagnosis and treatment of all HIV-associated conditions was included in the essential health service package of the country to ensure unhindered access to comprehensive services to everyone in need.

To maximize healthy and productive retention in care and treatment, the health sector established sustained partnership with HIV-positive individuals and associations. Associations of HIV-positive individuals have been in charge of treatment adherence counseling, early tracing and encouraging re-engagement into care and treatment in cases of loss to follow up. Similar efforts have been made to bridge the chasm in recommendations by modern providers and religious platforms and traditional healers. The health sector has been effective in convincing major religions in the country that medical and spiritual treatments are not incompatible. The case of co-administering HIV medicines and Holy Water is seen as one of the most successful strategies for treatment adherence and retention in care in the country. Holy Water is considered ‘a cure for major diseases’ among followers of the major religious denomination in Ethiopia.

Achievements to date and new initiatives

Since 1990, more than 90% reduction in new HIV infection has been recorded. Survival of HIV-positive individuals has substantially improved. At present, about 70% of HIV-positive people in the country know their status and 65% are on treatment. Globally, 60% of HIV-positive individuals know their status and 46% of positives receive treatment.

The UNAIDS three 90s (identifying 90% of HIV-positives, linking 90% of the positives to treatment and viral suppression in 90% of those on treatment) by 2020 and the global commitment to end AIDS by 2030 has spurred the progress. Coherent with these global commitments, there are several revitalization efforts dealing with both prevention and treatment. With determined focus to end AIDS as public health threat in 2030, the health sector has intensified inter-sectoral collaboration, mayoral forums and expanded media campaign.  In partnership with key stakeholders, the Ministry of Health recently launched HIV Catch up Campaign to accelerate testing the right people and link all positives to treatment. A total of 178 towns and cities have been selected for targeted testing and treatment strategies including rights-based partnership with index cases.

Other potentially game changing initiatives include instituting regular surveillance targeting workforce of large development projects to tailor prevention efforts, to understand active transmission dynamics and promote early and sustained treatment for positives. Ethiopia has also adopted the new paradigm of treating all HIV-positive people. Further, a new national compassionate and respectful care initiative will minimize stigma and discrimination and boost retention on treatment.

Conclusion

Excellent partnership between the government, key stakeholders particularly the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief and the Global Fund, and the community has helped the country rise to the tectonic challenge of HIV. The Ethiopian experience shows that we have to accelerate our efforts to end AIDS for good. Although we might be far from new discoveries like HIV vaccine or cure, it is possible that the battle against AIDS could be won using the weapons we have. It is also possible that HIV could be the youngest disease to be eliminated in the history of humankind.

 

 

Kenya in a Bad Shape about Open Defecation Free Goal

Even though the national law establishes the right to “reasonable standards of sanitation”, some Kenyan people are denied them. Especially in rural areas, the worst-off people face poor living conditions due to open defecation. The Government is implementing a four year strategy to fight against this scourge, but corruption, misappropriation and mismanagement risk to frustrate the efforts

Pietro_picture-150x150

by Pietro Dionisio

Degree in Political Science, International Relations

Cesare Alfieri School, University of Florence, Italy

Kenya in a Bad Shape about Open Defecation Free Goal

 

The Kenyan Constitution Article 43 (b) declares sanitation as a basic human right and guarantees the right of every person to “reasonable standards of sanitation.”

Despite the law, open defecation is an issue in the Country, where almost 50% of rural people still lack access to basic sanitation. Admittedly, access to sanitation has shown only a slight increase from  1990 (25%) to 2013 (32%). To make things even worse, most facilities (72%) only consist of pit latrines providing insufficient levels of safety, hygiene and privacy.

People cannot bear that situation any longer. What’s more, this context has a huge economic impact since Kenya loses KES 57 billion annually due to poor sanitation.

It has been estimated that in the Country an average 14% of total population usually practice open defecation, though the real rate could be higher.Relevantly, there are massive inequalities among counties. While in some of them the rate is about 75% of local population, in Turkana county it peaks beyond 82%.

Typically, open defecation is bound up with poverty:  more than 60% of the poorest wealth quintile practice it as against less than 1% in the wealthiest quintiles. As such, it comes as no surprise that access to sanitation facilities is higher in the lower poverty gap index counties, as compared with those counties with a higher poverty gap index.

These circumstances entail deep consequences on people’s (especially children) health. As such, it is not by chance that 35% of children in Kenya suffer from moderate to severe stunting. Childhood stunting, which can affect both educational and long-term productivity outcomes, has been linked, in fact, to poor sanitation and open defecation. Not to mention that, as a consequence of the lack of access to water and sanitation, diarrhea is second to pneumonia as a cause of death in children under five.

Adding to the burden of sickness and death, inadequate sanitation threatens to contaminate Kenya’s water sources and undermine human dignity. Access to safe water supplies throughout Kenya is only 59% currently. And while rural areas are those more plagued, cities are not performing much better. In fact, rapid urbanization has not been followed by a parallel growth of water and sanitation services. Some 15 million city dwellers lack access to a piped water supply or sanitation services, and this number continues to rise. In poor urban zones, less than 20% of the population have access to sanitation, and 80% of facilities are shallow pit latrines that add to the environment pollution while coupling with only 12% estimated sewerage coverage and a barely 5% effectively treated national sewerage.

Against this backdrop, the Kenyan Government just implemented the National Open Defecation Free Kenya 2020 Campaign Framework 2016-2020 as an attempt to make the Country open defecation free by 2020 and achieve the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) N. 6.

So compounded, the Campaign aligns with the “Kenya Environmental Sanitation and Hygiene Policy (KESHP)2016-2030” and the “Kenya Environmental Sanitation and Hygiene Strategic Framework (KESSF) 2016-2020” respectively.

The overall campaign goal is to eradicate open defecation and declare all counties and Kenya Open Defecation Free by the end of 2020. The specific objectives of the campaign are to:

  • Develop capacities of key Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) stakeholders in all 47 counties by 2017.
  • Develop an effective Planning, Monitoring Evaluation and Research Unit (PM&ER) system for more effective evidence-based approaches to the campaign targets.
  • Mobilize partners and the media to support the campaign goals.
  • Facilitate and assist county governments in achieving their respective Open Defecation Free sub counties, wards and villages targets.
  • Engage and enable the private sector to respond effectively to the demand created for sanitation materials and products.
  • Mobilize and allocate adequate resources to enable county governments to achieve their Open Defecation Free sub counties, wards and villages targets.

To implement the “National Open Defecation Free Kenya 2020 Campaign” over the next four years, both national and county governments will require a large outlay of financial resources. The overall investment required over the next four years (2016/17-2019/20) to achieve 100% Open Defecation Free by 2020 across all the 47 counties in Kenya is estimated at KES 41.6 billion. Because of limited resources, earmarking of money should align as much as possible with the national and counties’ priorities. As such, an efficient monitoring and evaluation system should be put in place to improve the already working one.

Relevantly, it is fundamental to concretely fight against corruption and misappropriation. In the  Transparency International’s 2015 Corruption Perception Index, Kenya was listed as one of the world’s most corrupt countries, ranking 139 out of 168.

The strategy set in motion by the Kenyan government is deeply based on funding from international agencies and organizations including, among others, the World Bank, UNICEF, and AMREF. The Government should consider these funds as a starting point and use them just to implement the strategy and make it sustainable in the long run. Unfortunately, it looks like this wouldn’t be the case due to corruption, misappropriation, and mismanagement, among other bad habits.

These habits should be given up in order not to lose an opportunity to improve sanitation and make the Country free from open defecation. It makes no matter should that happen in 2020 or later, provided a step by step, policy by policy gradual improvement becomes visible. Not for money or as a clue for developed countries that their money is spent well, but for Kenyan people deserving wealthy living conditions.

Breaking News: Link 216

Breaking News Links, as part of the research project PEAH (Policies for Equitable Access to Health), aim to focus on the latest challenges by trade and governments rules to equitable access to health in resource-limited settings

DSCN1778

Breaking News: Link 216

 

UN Secretary-General Urges Action On High-Level Panel Report On Medicines Access 

WHO Director Candidates Nabarro, Szócska Speak On Medicines Prices And IP 

EB140: World Health Organization publishes annotated agenda for January 2017 Executive Board 

‘Advocacy for Health and Social Justice Works: the Case of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)’ by Roberto De Vogli 

Bridges Special Update #3 | At Marrakech Climate Talks, Universal Pledge to Ramp Up “Irreversible” Momentum 

Climate change, Trump and finance: A look back at COP22 

MEPs back pollution rules in bid to save 200,000 lives a year 

Trump Vows To Back Out Of The Trans-Pacific Partnership, Effectively Killing It 

As health markets develop, partnerships will drive sustainability 

TransGlobalHealth: the Call for 2017 (OPEN) 

Public Health 3.0: A Blueprint For The Future Of Public Health 

Hollowed Out: Big Donors, Inequality, and the Threat to Civil Society 

Human Rights Reader 400 

Press release: Robust funding critical to ending the pandemic of violence against women and girls 

Oxfam: Hypocrites or pragmatists? 

How UK trade policies could help heal global health care inequalities 

In Greece, lack of legal aid leaves migrants and refugees guessing 

Amnesty: Refugees are in urgent need of protection from sexual and gender-based violence  

Looking back to look forward: How lessons from the history of health policy and systems research and practice can shape and inform its future  

Supporting The Fight Against HIV/AIDS Now More Than Ever 

UNAIDS Report: Less Deaths From HIV But Growing Resistance Creates Great Risk 

Projected Uptake of New Antiretroviral (ARV) Medicines in Adults in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Forecast Analysis 2015-2025 

UNITAID AND ANRS LAUNCH INITIATIVE IN CAMEROON TO BRING NEW HIV TREATMENTS TO AFRICA 

Research Roundup: Long-lasting pills, HIV testing, and starving bacteria of iron 

What global disease threat worries public health officials most? 

Zika virus is no longer a global health emergency, UN health agency says 

MSF open letter to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria 

Pakistan will become polio free by the end 2016: UNICEF 

Children who died from diseases preventable by vaccination quantified 

India’s response to the global health challenges 

How a Corporate Funder Is Taking On the Opioid Epidemic 

Opinion: Corporate capture of African agriculture 

Advocacy for Health and Social Justice Works: the Case of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)

The recognition that the TTIP prioritized the “right to profit” of transnational corporations over the “right to health” of citizens deeply affected people’s sense of justice. It is exactly for this reason that it triggered such widespread civic protest that has been decisive in stopping the fast-track approval of the TTIP 

 signed_roberto_de-vogli

 by Roberto De Vogli*, PhD, MPH1 2 3

1 Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, US

2 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Division of Population Health, University College London, London, UK

3 Department of Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy

Advocacy for Health and Social Justice Works: the Case of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)

 

The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) is a moribund treaty. The largest ever free trade agreement, designed to influence countries that account for 50% of global Gross Domestic Product (GDP) (1), has received a series of lethal blows from a critical mass of organised civic society organisations and advocates. The agreement may not be dead yet, but it is severely wounded. It was supposed to be signed this year, but France, through its Minister for Foreign Trade, Matthias Fekl, has already demanded an end to TTIP talks (2). Without the French support, the deal is not going very far, actually nowhere; and the chances that it will be approved in the future are rather slim.

But make no mistake: major lobbyists of the TTIP, such as those large transnational corporations (TNCs) that have proposed the treaty to the EU and USA, will not concede an easy defeat. In fact, they are already working hard to find new ways to move the trade agenda forward. For example, another treaty, similarly dangerous for our health, has been recently approved: the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, or CETA (3) Yet, there is little doubt that the political efforts of protest movements have been decisive in stopping the fast-track approval of the TTIP. Civic society made a difference and, to some extent, the protest against the treaty has already partially succeeded.

What caused this preliminary success? What accounts for incapability of the EU and US to approve the TTIP on time? Not many years ago, the first acts of protests against the TTIP were largely ignored. The early pioneers of the campaign were easily dismissed as lunatics, or radicals. Now, only a few have audacity to openly support the treaty. The belief that the TTIP will produce significant economic benefits and that the income generated by the TTIP will trickle down to the general population (4) is not taken very seriously. The public is instead convinced more than ever that the TTIP is a dangerous policy for people’s health. In a recent review of the literature, we showed that the trade deal is likely to have a series of negative health consequences including the underutilization of needed healthcare services and medications especially among vulnerable populations such as low-income communities and people with multiple chronic diseases. In the same review, we also indicated that the TTIP is likely to generate a negative impact on regulations aimed at reducing cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, diet- and agriculture-related diseases. The treaty is also very dangerous because it can impair international environmental agreements on climate change that has been recognised as the major threat to global health of the century. (5)

The publication of evidence on the potential health effects of the TTIP in academic journals, and the wide dissemination of the same results through social media, newspapers, and other outlets, was certainly important, but not crucial. Very often, scientific evidence is ignored and political decisions are taken on the basis of collective emotions about a topic. What persuaded governments to withdraw support from the TTIP was not the science on its negative impact on health probably. Rather, it was the active involvement of civic society and the massive protests of non-governmental organizations and activists that reduced the political desirability of the trade deal. The relentless advocacy work performed by the alliance of organizations such as those under the ban STOP TTIP European Initiative Against TTIP and CETA (6), the massive demonstrations against the treaty throughout Europe involving up to 250,000 people (7) and the collection of over 3.4 million signatures demanding the abandonment of the treaty were impressive demonstration of people’s power by any standards. (8)

What mobilized the most these protest movements? It is difficult to establish a single cause for there is no quantitative data to rely on. Yet, a plausible culprit seems the widespread recognition of the potential injustices promoted by the TTIP. People are particularly outraged, and for very good reasons, about the TTIP’s Investor to State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) arbitration system, a mechanism that allows TNCs to sue governments when a policy or law reduces the value of their investment. It is especially through the ISDS that the TTIP has finally been recognized for what it is: not a free trade agreement, but an investor protection treaty.

It is no coincidence that the treaty was made in secret and supposed to be approved relatively quickly among closed doors. About 92% of consultation meetings for the TTIP have been carried out with private companies or their representatives with no involvement of civic society. (9) It was only thanks to organizations such as Wikileaks (10) and Greenpeace (11) that we are all aware of the details of the treaty. Clearly, the recognition that the TTIP prioritized the “right to profit” of TNCs over the “right to health” of citizens deeply affected people’s sense of justice. It is exactly for this reason that it triggered such widespread civic protest.

The story of the temporary defeat of the TTIP contributes to our understanding of what needs to be done in order to build effective, successful public health movements. It shows that, in order to mobilize people around health issues, it is key to address their sense of justice and injustice. In a time where there is widespread hopelessness about so many intractable problems, from climate change to rising income inequality, this story provides a ray of hope for the future of public health. Those who do not bother engaging in advocacy work because they feel hopeless and believe that large TNCs are just too powerful to be defeated have been, at least in this case, proven wrong. Indeed, they have been proven wrong multiple times as lessons about success stories in reducing cigarette smoking and car accidents have shown us. This story adds to the literature and shows one more time that public health advocacy works, especially when it addresses problems of social injustice at the same time. (12)

 

References

  1. Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. The Economic Analysis Explained. Brussels: European Commission, Centre for Economic Policy Research, 2013.
  2. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/aug/30/france-demands-end-to-ttip-trade-talks-matthias-fekl
  3. http://www.epsu.org/sites/default/files/article/files/Health-social-Services%20in%20CETA-TTIP%20Executive%20summary_2016.04_EN.pdf
  4. Raza W, Grumiller J, Taylor L, Tröster B, von Arnim R. ASSESS TTIP: Assessing the Claimed Benefits of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Final Report. Vienna: Austrian Foundation for Development Research, 2014.
  5. De Vogli R and Renzetti N. The Potential Impact of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Parternship (TTIP) on Public Health? Epidemiol & Prev 2016;40(2).
  6. https://stop-ttip.org
  7. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/10/berlin-anti-ttip-trade-deal-rally-hundreds-thousands-protesters
  8. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/ttip-three-million-people-sign-petition-to-scrap-controversial-trade-deal-a6680411.html
  9. Corporate Europe Observatory. Who lobbies most on TTIP? Available: http://corporateeurope.org/international-trade/2014/07/who-lobbies-most-ttip Accessed: February 19, 2014.
  10. Public Citizen. The Trans-Atlantic “Free Trade” Agreement (TAFTA). U.S. and European Corporations’ Latest Venue to Attack Consumer and Environmental Safeguards? 2015.
  11. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/may/01/leaked-ttip-documents-cast-doubt-on-eu-us-trade-deal
  12. Gielen A, Green L. The Impact of Policy, Environmental and Educational Interventions: A Synthesis of the Evidence from Two Public Health Success Stories. Health Education & Behavior 2015;42(1S)20S-34S.

 

————————————————-

*Correspondence to: Roberto De Vogli, Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis. One Shields Ave. Med Sci 1-C Build. Davis, CA 95616 email: rdevogli@ucdavis.edu

 

 

Breaking News: Link 215

Breaking News Links, as part of the research project PEAH (Policies for Equitable Access to Health), aim to focus on the latest challenges by trade and governments rules to equitable access to health in resource-limited settings

DSCN1778

Breaking News: Link 215

 

UN climate conference adopts declaration for action 

Global Security Leaders Have Some Climate Change Advice For Donald Trump 

Climate Change and Clean Energy in the 2030 Agenda: What Role for the Trade System? 

Paris climate deal at risk unless countries step up plans, says watchdog 

5 things you need to know about climate change and hunger 

What does Trump mean for development aid? 

Trump should be good medicine for the pharmaceutical industry. Here’s why 

Opinion: Trump, the anti-Obama for Africa

Think Blue: A Way Forward for Liberal Philanthropy in the Age of Trump 

Who’s afraid of Mr Trump? 

CETA is ‘no gold standard’ finds report, ahead of vote in Parliament 

Conferenza CUAMM “La valutazione dei progetti di cooperazione sanitaria internazionale. Teorie, esperienze e prospettive future”, Padova 2 dicembre 2016, sede centrale dell’Università 

TRIPS Council Meets on Public Health, Access to Medicines 

Access To Medicine Index Finds Progress In Pharma’s Efforts 

Which Big Drug Companies Are Helping the Poor? Here’s the List 

WTO ‘Paragraph 6’ System For Affordable Medicine: Time For Change? 

KEI December 2, 2016 meeting on the delinkage of R&D costs from drug prices 

A year of Agenda 2030: The progress and challenges of the SDGs so far 

Defining The Health Care System’s Role In Addressing Social Determinants And Population Health 

Is health a human right or a citizen’s right? 

How Can Finance Ministries Support a Sustainable HIV Response? Live stream 28 November 2016 

The Medicines Patent Pool Announces First World Health Organization Prequalification Submissions for Generic Dolutegravir 

Act fast to get life-saving antivirals 

Nigeria Will Become Polio-Free: Challenges, Successes, and Lessons Learned for the Quest to Eradicate Polio 

MSF welcomes Pfizer’s pneumonia vaccine price reduction for children in humanitarian emergencies 

WHO welcomes global health funding for malaria vaccine 

Good news: Measles vaccine saved lives of 20 million kids 

Letter to President Obama on TPP Biologics 

WHO: World Antibiotic Awareness Week 

Open defecation in India: forcing people to stop is not the solution